Congo vs Solomon Islands: Employers, female (% of female employment)
Employers, female (% of female employment) over time
- Congo
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Solomon Islands currently reports 0.5% against 0.5% in Congo, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Solomon Islands ahead.
Congo ranks 177th and Solomon Islands ranks 176th of 187 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 2 and Solomon Islands in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Solomon Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.4% | 0.5% | 0.1% | Solomon Islands |
| 2000s | 0.6% | 0.4% | 0.2% | Congo |
| 2010s | 0.5% | 0.4% | 0.1% | Congo |
| 2020s | 0.5% | 0.5% | 0.0% | Solomon Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher employers, female (% of female employment), Congo or Solomon Islands?
- Solomon Islands, at 0.5% against 0.5% in Congo as of 2025.
- What is the difference in employers, female (% of female employment) between Congo and Solomon Islands?
- 0.0%, with Solomon Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Solomon Islands?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do Congo and Solomon Islands rank globally for employers, female (% of female employment)?
- Congo ranks 177th and Solomon Islands ranks 176th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ILO Modelled Estimates database (ILOEST), International Labour Organization (ILO), published as Employers, female (% of female employment) (modeled ILO estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Employers are those workers who, working on their own account or with one or a few partners, hold the type of jobs defined as a "self-employment jobs" i.e. jobs where the remuneration is directly dependent upon the profits derived from the goods and services produced), and, in this capacity, have engaged, on a continuous basis, one or more persons to work for them as employee(s).