Armenia vs El Salvador: Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International Private
Armenia
16.9%
in 2022
El Salvador
17.9%
in 2022
Armenia rank
5th
El Salvador rank
3rd
Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International Private over time
- Armenia
- El Salvador
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 17.9% against 16.9% in Armenia, a difference of 1.0%.
That makes El Salvador's figure about 1.1 times Armenia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 5th and El Salvador ranks 3rd of 28 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 2 and El Salvador in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | El Salvador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 18.4% | 11.0% | 7.4% | Armenia |
| 2010s | 25.3% | 13.1% | 12.2% | Armenia |
| 2020s | 16.2% | 17.5% | 1.3% | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international private, Armenia or El Salvador?
- El Salvador, at 17.9% against 16.9% in Armenia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international private between Armenia and El Salvador?
- 1.0%, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and El Salvador?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2022.
- How do Armenia and El Salvador rank globally for coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international private?
- Armenia ranks 5th and El Salvador ranks 3rd of 28 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International Private Transfers. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of population participating in International Private Transfers programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)