Latvia vs South Africa: Collective bargaining coverage rate
Collective bargaining coverage rate over time
- Latvia
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 30.1 against 27.3 in Latvia, a difference of 2.8.
That makes South Africa's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 35th and South Africa ranks 32nd of 68 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher collective bargaining coverage rate, Latvia or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 30.1 against 27.3 in Latvia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in collective bargaining coverage rate between Latvia and South Africa?
- 2.8, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and South Africa?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2019.
- How do Latvia and South Africa rank globally for collective bargaining coverage rate?
- Latvia ranks 35th and South Africa ranks 32nd of 68 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as Collective bargaining coverage rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The collective bargaining coverage rate conveys the number of employees whose pay and/or conditions of employment are determined by one or more collective agreement(s) as a percentage of the total number of employees. Collective bargaining coverage includes, to the extent possible, workers covered by collective agreements in virtue of their extension. Collective bargaining coverage rates are adjusted for the possibility that some workers do not have the right to bargain collectively over wages (e.g. workers in the public services who have their wages determined by state regulation or other methods involving consultation), unless otherwise stated in the notes. The statistics presented in this table result from an ILO data compilation effort (including an annual questionnaire and numerous special enquiries), with contributions from J. Visser. For more information, refer to the Industrial Relations data (IRdata) database description.