Hungary vs Japan: Collective bargaining coverage rate
Collective bargaining coverage rate over time
- Hungary
- Japan
How they compare
Hungary currently reports 17.8 against 16.8 in Japan, a difference of 1.
That makes Hungary's figure about 1.1 times Japan's.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Hungary has been ahead every year.
Hungary ranks 42nd and Japan ranks 44th of 68 countries.
Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 26.72 | 18.57 | 8.15 | Hungary |
| 2010s | 23.74 | 17.84 | 5.9 | Hungary |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher collective bargaining coverage rate, Hungary or Japan?
- Hungary, at 17.8 against 16.8 in Japan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in collective bargaining coverage rate between Hungary and Japan?
- 1, with Hungary ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Japan?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Hungary and Japan rank globally for collective bargaining coverage rate?
- Hungary ranks 42nd and Japan ranks 44th of 68 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as Collective bargaining coverage rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The collective bargaining coverage rate conveys the number of employees whose pay and/or conditions of employment are determined by one or more collective agreement(s) as a percentage of the total number of employees. Collective bargaining coverage includes, to the extent possible, workers covered by collective agreements in virtue of their extension. Collective bargaining coverage rates are adjusted for the possibility that some workers do not have the right to bargain collectively over wages (e.g. workers in the public services who have their wages determined by state regulation or other methods involving consultation), unless otherwise stated in the notes. The statistics presented in this table result from an ILO data compilation effort (including an annual questionnaire and numerous special enquiries), with contributions from J. Visser. For more information, refer to the Industrial Relations data (IRdata) database description.