Argentina vs Germany: Collective bargaining coverage rate
Collective bargaining coverage rate over time
- Argentina
- Germany
How they compare
Germany currently reports 51.8 against 49.4 in Argentina, a difference of 2.4.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Germany has been ahead every year.
Argentina ranks 20th and Germany ranks 18th of 68 countries.
Germany has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Germany | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 50.75 | 61.1 | 10.35 | Germany |
| 2010s | 51.01 | 57.16 | 6.14 | Germany |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher collective bargaining coverage rate, Argentina or Germany?
- Germany, at 51.8 against 49.4 in Argentina as of 2019.
- What is the difference in collective bargaining coverage rate between Argentina and Germany?
- 2.4, with Germany ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Germany?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2018.
- How do Argentina and Germany rank globally for collective bargaining coverage rate?
- Argentina ranks 20th and Germany ranks 18th of 68 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as Collective bargaining coverage rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The collective bargaining coverage rate conveys the number of employees whose pay and/or conditions of employment are determined by one or more collective agreement(s) as a percentage of the total number of employees. Collective bargaining coverage includes, to the extent possible, workers covered by collective agreements in virtue of their extension. Collective bargaining coverage rates are adjusted for the possibility that some workers do not have the right to bargain collectively over wages (e.g. workers in the public services who have their wages determined by state regulation or other methods involving consultation), unless otherwise stated in the notes. The statistics presented in this table result from an ILO data compilation effort (including an annual questionnaire and numerous special enquiries), with contributions from J. Visser. For more information, refer to the Industrial Relations data (IRdata) database description.