Mongolia vs Viet Nam: Benefit-cost ratio - International Private Transfers -1st quintile
Mongolia
0.2159 poorest
in 2020
Viet Nam
0.2267 poorest
in 2020
Mongolia rank
11th
Viet Nam rank
10th
Benefit-cost ratio - International Private Transfers -1st quintile over time
- Mongolia
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Viet Nam currently reports 0.2267 poorest against 0.2159 poorest in Mongolia, a difference of 0.0108 poorest.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Mongolia ahead.
Mongolia ranks 11th and Viet Nam ranks 10th of 27 countries.
Viet Nam has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.1172 poorest | 0.1327 poorest | 0.0155 poorest | Viet Nam |
| 2020s | 0.2159 poorest | 0.2267 poorest | 0.0108 poorest | Viet Nam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefit-cost ratio - international private transfers -1st quintile, Mongolia or Viet Nam?
- Viet Nam, at 0.2267 poorest against 0.2159 poorest in Mongolia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in benefit-cost ratio - international private transfers -1st quintile between Mongolia and Viet Nam?
- 0.0108 poorest, with Viet Nam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Viet Nam?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Mongolia and Viet Nam rank globally for benefit-cost ratio - international private transfers -1st quintile?
- Mongolia ranks 11th and Viet Nam ranks 10th of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefit-cost ratio - International Private Transfers -1st quintile (poorest). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in International Private Transfers programs (%)