Mongolia vs Paraguay: Benefit-cost ratio - International Private Transfers -1st quintile
Mongolia
0.2159 poorest
in 2020
Paraguay
0.1776 poorest
in 2022
Mongolia rank
11th
Paraguay rank
14th
Benefit-cost ratio - International Private Transfers -1st quintile over time
- Mongolia
- Paraguay
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 0.2159 poorest against 0.1776 poorest in Paraguay, a difference of 0.0383 poorest.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.2 times Paraguay's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Mongolia ahead.
Mongolia ranks 11th and Paraguay ranks 14th of 27 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Mongolia averaged higher in 2 and Paraguay in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Paraguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.1625 poorest | 0.1023 poorest | 0.0602 poorest | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 0.1184 poorest | 0.1266 poorest | 0.0082 poorest | Paraguay |
| 2020s | 0.2159 poorest | 0.1062 poorest | 0.1097 poorest | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefit-cost ratio - international private transfers -1st quintile, Mongolia or Paraguay?
- Mongolia, at 0.2159 poorest against 0.1776 poorest in Paraguay as of 2020.
- What is the difference in benefit-cost ratio - international private transfers -1st quintile between Mongolia and Paraguay?
- 0.0383 poorest, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Paraguay?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
- How do Mongolia and Paraguay rank globally for benefit-cost ratio - international private transfers -1st quintile?
- Mongolia ranks 11th and Paraguay ranks 14th of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefit-cost ratio - International Private Transfers -1st quintile (poorest). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in International Private Transfers programs (%)