El Salvador vs Kyrgyzstan: Benefit-cost ratio - Domestic Private Transfers -1st quintile
El Salvador
0.2091 poorest
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
0.2105 poorest
in 2020
El Salvador rank
20th
Kyrgyzstan rank
19th
Benefit-cost ratio - Domestic Private Transfers -1st quintile over time
- El Salvador
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 0.2105 poorest against 0.2091 poorest in El Salvador, a difference of 0.0014 poorest.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
El Salvador ranks 20th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 19th of 31 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefit-cost ratio - domestic private transfers -1st quintile, El Salvador or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 0.2105 poorest against 0.2091 poorest in El Salvador as of 2020.
- What is the difference in benefit-cost ratio - domestic private transfers -1st quintile between El Salvador and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.0014 poorest, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Kyrgyzstan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2019.
- How do El Salvador and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for benefit-cost ratio - domestic private transfers -1st quintile?
- El Salvador ranks 20th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 19th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefit-cost ratio - Domestic Private Transfers -1st quintile (poorest). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in Domestic Private Transfers programs (%)