Ecuador vs Kyrgyzstan: Benefit-cost ratio - Domestic Private Transfers -1st quintile

Ecuador
0.1708
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
0.1843
in 2020
Ecuador rank
23rd
Kyrgyzstan rank
21st

Benefit-cost ratio - Domestic Private Transfers -1st quintile over time

  • Ecuador
  • Kyrgyzstan
0.10.150.20.250.3200620142022

How they compare

Kyrgyzstan currently reports 0.1843 against 0.1708 in Ecuador, a difference of 0.0135.

That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 23rd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 21st of 30 countries.

Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Kyrgyzstan Difference Ahead
2010s 0.1556 0.2325 0.0769 Kyrgyzstan
2020s 0.0835 0.1843 0.1008 Kyrgyzstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher benefit-cost ratio - domestic private transfers -1st quintile, Ecuador or Kyrgyzstan?
Kyrgyzstan, at 0.1843 against 0.1708 in Ecuador as of 2020.
What is the difference in benefit-cost ratio - domestic private transfers -1st quintile between Ecuador and Kyrgyzstan?
0.0135, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Kyrgyzstan?
9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
How do Ecuador and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for benefit-cost ratio - domestic private transfers -1st quintile?
Ecuador ranks 23rd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 21st of 30 countries.
Where does this data come from?
ASPIRE, published as Benefit-cost ratio - Domestic Private Transfers -1st quintile (poorest) -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Kyrgyzstan: Benefit-cost ratio - Domestic Private Transfers -1st quintile. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/benefit-cost-ratio-domestic-private-transfers-1st-quintile-poorest-rural/ecuador/kyrgyz-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/benefit-cost-ratio-domestic-private-transfers-1st-quintile-poorest-rural/ecuador/kyrgyz-republic/">Ecuador vs Kyrgyzstan: Benefit-cost ratio - Domestic Private Transfers -1st quintile</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Benefit-cost ratio - Domestic Private Transfers -1st quintile (poorest) -rural
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
30 places, 295 data points, 2003–2023
Last refreshed

Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in Domestic Private Transfers programs (%)