Brazil vs Kyrgyzstan: Benefit-cost ratio - Domestic Private Transfers -1st quintile

Brazil
0.1776
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
0.1843
in 2020
Brazil rank
22nd
Kyrgyzstan rank
21st

Benefit-cost ratio - Domestic Private Transfers -1st quintile over time

  • Brazil
  • Kyrgyzstan
00.10.20.3200620142022

How they compare

Kyrgyzstan currently reports 0.1843 against 0.1776 in Brazil, a difference of 0.0067.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Brazil ahead.

Brazil ranks 22nd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 21st of 30 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 1 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Kyrgyzstan Difference Ahead
2010s 0.2274 0.2529 0.0255 Kyrgyzstan
2020s 0.1958 0.1843 0.0115 Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher benefit-cost ratio - domestic private transfers -1st quintile, Brazil or Kyrgyzstan?
Kyrgyzstan, at 0.1843 against 0.1776 in Brazil as of 2020.
What is the difference in benefit-cost ratio - domestic private transfers -1st quintile between Brazil and Kyrgyzstan?
0.0067, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Kyrgyzstan?
6 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2020.
How do Brazil and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for benefit-cost ratio - domestic private transfers -1st quintile?
Brazil ranks 22nd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 21st of 30 countries.
Where does this data come from?
ASPIRE, published as Benefit-cost ratio - Domestic Private Transfers -1st quintile (poorest) -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Kyrgyzstan: Benefit-cost ratio - Domestic Private Transfers -1st quintile. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/benefit-cost-ratio-domestic-private-transfers-1st-quintile-poorest-rural/brazil/kyrgyz-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/benefit-cost-ratio-domestic-private-transfers-1st-quintile-poorest-rural/brazil/kyrgyz-republic/">Brazil vs Kyrgyzstan: Benefit-cost ratio - Domestic Private Transfers -1st quintile</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Benefit-cost ratio - Domestic Private Transfers -1st quintile (poorest) -rural
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
30 places, 295 data points, 2003–2023
Last refreshed

Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in Domestic Private Transfers programs (%)