Croatia vs Iran, Islamic Republic of: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 32 - Employment by

Croatia
109.85 Persons
in 2022
Iran, Islamic Republic of
1,600 Persons
in 2022
Croatia rank
19th
Iran, Islamic Republic of rank
20th

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 32 - Employment by over time

  • Croatia
  • Iran, Islamic Republic of
05001.0k1.5k200020112022

How they compare

Iran, Islamic Republic of currently reports 1,600 Persons against 109.85 Persons in Croatia, a difference of 1,490 Persons.

That makes Iran, Islamic Republic of's figure about 14.6 times Croatia's.

Across all 23 years both countries report, Iran, Islamic Republic of has been ahead every year.

Croatia ranks 19th and Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 20th of 27 countries.

Iran, Islamic Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Croatia Iran, Islamic Republic of Difference Ahead
2000s 109.85 Persons 1,465 Persons 1,355 Persons Iran, Islamic Republic of
2010s 108.19 Persons 1,445 Persons 1,336 Persons Iran, Islamic Republic of
2020s 117.3 Persons 1,493 Persons 1,375 Persons Iran, Islamic Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 32 - employment by, Croatia or Iran, Islamic Republic of?
Iran, Islamic Republic of, at 1,600 Persons against 109.85 Persons in Croatia as of 2022.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 32 - employment by between Croatia and Iran, Islamic Republic of?
1,490 Persons, with Iran, Islamic Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Iran, Islamic Republic of?
23 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
How do Croatia and Iran, Islamic Republic of rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 32 - employment by?
Croatia ranks 19th and Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 20th of 27 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 32 - Employment by occupation — Workers in public administration, defence and social security. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Croatia vs Iran, Islamic Republic of: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 32 - Employment by. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-32-employment-by-occupation-workers-in-public/croatia-2/iran-islamic-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-32-employment-by-occupation-workers-in-public/croatia-2/iran-islamic-rep/">Croatia vs Iran, Islamic Republic of: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 32 - Employment by</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 32 - Employment by occupation — Workers in public administration, defence and social security
Unit
Persons
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
231 places, 5,301 data points, 2000–2022
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 32 shows total employment by sex and within 14 different economic sectors.