Brazil vs Least developed countries: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 32 - Employment by

Brazil
5,189 Persons
in 2022
Least developed countries
7,293 Persons
in 2022
Brazil rank
5th
Least developed countries rank
6th

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 32 - Employment by over time

  • Brazil
  • Least developed countries
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k200020112022

How they compare

Least developed countries currently reports 7,293 Persons against 5,189 Persons in Brazil, a difference of 2,104 Persons.

That makes Least developed countries's figure about 1.4 times Brazil's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Least developed countries ahead.

Brazil ranks 5th and Least developed countries ranks 6th of 156 countries.

Least developed countries has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Least developed countries Difference Ahead
2000s 4,139 Persons 5,146 Persons 1,008 Persons Least developed countries
2010s 5,313 Persons 6,081 Persons 767.59 Persons Least developed countries
2020s 5,110 Persons 7,081 Persons 1,971 Persons Least developed countries

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 32 - employment by, Brazil or Least developed countries?
Least developed countries, at 7,293 Persons against 5,189 Persons in Brazil as of 2022.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 32 - employment by between Brazil and Least developed countries?
2,104 Persons, with Least developed countries ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Least developed countries?
23 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
How do Brazil and Least developed countries rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 32 - employment by?
Brazil ranks 5th and Least developed countries ranks 6th of 156 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 32 - Employment by occupation — Workers in public administration, defence and social security. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Least developed countries: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 32 - Employment by. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-32-employment-by-occupation-workers-in-public/brazil/least-developed-countries/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-32-employment-by-occupation-workers-in-public/brazil/least-developed-countries/">Brazil vs Least developed countries: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 32 - Employment by</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 32 - Employment by occupation — Workers in public administration, defence and social security
Unit
Persons
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
231 places, 5,301 data points, 2000–2022
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 32 shows total employment by sex and within 14 different economic sectors.