Brazil vs South Africa: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social
Brazil
47.1%
in 2022
South Africa
39.7%
in 2021
Brazil rank
11th
South Africa rank
14th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social over time
- Brazil
- South Africa
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 47.1% against 39.7% in South Africa, a difference of 7.4%.
That makes Brazil's figure about 1.2 times South Africa's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 11th and South Africa ranks 14th of 37 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 37.2% | 147.0% | 109.9% | South Africa |
| 2020s | 47.6% | 54.2% | 6.6% | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social, Brazil or South Africa?
- Brazil, at 47.1% against 39.7% in South Africa as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social between Brazil and South Africa?
- 7.4%, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and South Africa?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2021.
- How do Brazil and South Africa rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social?
- Brazil ranks 11th and South Africa ranks 14th of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social Protection and Labor. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group