Total weekly hours worked of employed persons (ILO modelled) in Uganda
Uganda: Total weekly hours worked of employed persons (ILO modelled) was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2025. ▼ Falling
Total weekly hours worked of employed persons (ILO modelled) in Uganda, 2005–2025
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
Uganda recorded 0 units per US$ of GDP for total weekly hours worked of employed persons (ilo modelled) in 2025.
The figure is down 9.9% on the previous year and up 18.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, total weekly hours worked of employed persons (ilo modelled) in Uganda peaked at 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2005 and was at its lowest, 0 units per US$ of GDP, in 2010.
Uganda ranks 13th of 185 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 21 years of available data.
Total weekly hours worked of employed persons (ILO modelled) in Uganda, year by year
| Year | units per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | — |
| 2006 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -5.1% |
| 2007 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -14.0% |
| 2008 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -15.3% |
| 2009 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -41.0% |
| 2010 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -5.5% |
| 2011 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +6.8% |
| 2012 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +18.6% |
| 2013 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +10.7% |
| 2014 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -25.1% |
| 2015 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +9.0% |
| 2016 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +19.9% |
| 2017 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +2.2% |
| 2018 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -2.7% |
| 2019 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -4.1% |
| 2020 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +9.6% |
| 2021 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +23.8% |
| 2022 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -7.0% |
| 2023 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -2.8% |
| 2024 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -6.0% |
| 2025 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -9.9% |
Uganda compared with similar countries
- Uganda's 0 units per US$ of GDP is above the median for low income countries, which is 0 units per US$ of GDP, 1.0× the median. (24 countries reporting)
- Uganda's 0 units per US$ of GDP is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 0 units per US$ of GDP, 1.5× the median. (47 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 5 |
| 2010s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 6 |
Countries ranked near Uganda
- 10 Malawi 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 11 Afghanistan 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 12 Nigeria 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 14 Tanzania 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 15 Guinea-Bissau 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 16 Democratic Republic of Congo 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
More work & labour data for Uganda
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual 0.0339 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth 0.0408 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth 0.0266 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate 1.02 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 3.77 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 46,664 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 59,035 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 60,822 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 60,013 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 120,835 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is total weekly hours worked of employed persons (ilo modelled) in Uganda?
- Total weekly hours worked of employed persons (ilo modelled) in Uganda was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2025, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest total weekly hours worked of employed persons (ilo modelled) recorded in Uganda?
- The highest recorded value was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2005.
- What is the lowest total weekly hours worked of employed persons (ilo modelled) recorded in Uganda?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2010.
- How does Uganda rank for total weekly hours worked of employed persons (ilo modelled)?
- Uganda ranks 13th out of 185 countries with data for 2025.
- Is total weekly hours worked of employed persons (ilo modelled) rising or falling in Uganda?
- Over the last ten years it is up 18.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Uganda data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Total weekly hours worked of employed persons (ILO modelled estimates), per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Total weekly hours worked of employed persons (ILO modelled estimates) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Total weekly hours worked of employed persons (ILO modelled estimates) ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Total weekly hours worked of employed persons International Labour Organization
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Total weekly hours worked of employed persons (ILO modelled estimates) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.