Total weekly hours worked of employed persons (ILO modelled) in Norway
Norway: Total weekly hours worked of employed persons (ILO modelled) was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2025. ▼ Falling
Total weekly hours worked of employed persons (ILO modelled) in Norway, 2005–2025
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
The most recent figure for total weekly hours worked of employed persons (ilo modelled) in Norway is 0 units per US$ of GDP, measured in 2025.
That represents a change of down 5.5% on the previous year and down 22.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, total weekly hours worked of employed persons (ilo modelled) in Norway peaked at 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2005 and was at its lowest, 0 units per US$ of GDP, in 2022.
Norway ranks 183rd of 185 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 21 years of available data.
Total weekly hours worked of employed persons (ILO modelled) in Norway, year by year
| Year | units per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | — |
| 2006 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -8.7% |
| 2007 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -13.3% |
| 2008 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -12.4% |
| 2009 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +15.6% |
| 2010 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -8.4% |
| 2011 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -12.8% |
| 2012 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -0.7% |
| 2013 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -3.0% |
| 2014 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +6.8% |
| 2015 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +28.5% |
| 2016 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +4.7% |
| 2017 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -8.0% |
| 2018 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -6.6% |
| 2019 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +7.3% |
| 2020 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +7.3% |
| 2021 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -25.4% |
| 2022 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -13.0% |
| 2023 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +21.7% |
| 2024 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +0.7% |
| 2025 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -5.5% |
Norway compared with similar countries
- Norway's 0 units per US$ of GDP is below the median for high income countries, which is 0 units per US$ of GDP, 32% of the median. (62 countries reporting)
- Norway's 0 units per US$ of GDP is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0 units per US$ of GDP, 25% of the median. (48 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 5 |
| 2010s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 6 |
Countries ranked near Norway
- 180 Iceland 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 181 Denmark 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 182 Switzerland 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 184 Ireland 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 185 Luxembourg 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
More work & labour data for Norway
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -0.2322 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -0.2413 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -0.2229 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.14 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 0.7506 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 6,138 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 663.52 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 2,690 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 2,724 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 5,414 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is total weekly hours worked of employed persons (ilo modelled) in Norway?
- Total weekly hours worked of employed persons (ilo modelled) in Norway was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2025, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest total weekly hours worked of employed persons (ilo modelled) recorded in Norway?
- The highest recorded value was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2005.
- What is the lowest total weekly hours worked of employed persons (ilo modelled) recorded in Norway?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2022.
- How does Norway rank for total weekly hours worked of employed persons (ilo modelled)?
- Norway ranks 183rd out of 185 countries with data for 2025.
- Is total weekly hours worked of employed persons (ilo modelled) rising or falling in Norway?
- Over the last ten years it is down 22.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Norway data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Total weekly hours worked of employed persons (ILO modelled estimates), per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Total weekly hours worked of employed persons (ILO modelled estimates) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Total weekly hours worked of employed persons (ILO modelled estimates) ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Total weekly hours worked of employed persons International Labour Organization
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Total weekly hours worked of employed persons (ILO modelled estimates) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.