Total weekly hours worked of employed persons (ILO modelled) in Iraq
Iraq: Total weekly hours worked of employed persons (ILO modelled) was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Total weekly hours worked of employed persons (ILO modelled) in Iraq, 2005–2025
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
Iraq recorded 0 units per US$ of GDP for total weekly hours worked of employed persons (ilo modelled) in 2025.
That represents a change of up 12.9% on the previous year and down 26.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, total weekly hours worked of employed persons (ilo modelled) in Iraq peaked at 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2005 and was at its lowest, 0 units per US$ of GDP, in 2022.
Iraq ranks 118th of 185 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Total weekly hours worked of employed persons (ILO modelled) in Iraq, year by year
| Year | units per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | — |
| 2006 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -22.7% |
| 2007 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -27.3% |
| 2008 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -31.7% |
| 2009 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +21.1% |
| 2010 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -17.5% |
| 2011 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -23.6% |
| 2012 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -11.7% |
| 2013 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -2.6% |
| 2014 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +6.1% |
| 2015 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +39.7% |
| 2016 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +2.5% |
| 2017 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -14.9% |
| 2018 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -17.9% |
| 2019 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -3.3% |
| 2020 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +24.7% |
| 2021 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -12.9% |
| 2022 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -20.3% |
| 2023 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +10.6% |
| 2024 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -1.4% |
| 2025 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +12.9% |
Iraq compared with similar countries
- Iraq's 0 units per US$ of GDP is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0 units per US$ of GDP, 70% of the median. (53 countries reporting)
- Iraq's 0 units per US$ of GDP is below the median for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, which is 0 units per US$ of GDP, 67% of the median. (23 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 5 |
| 2010s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 6 |
Countries ranked near Iraq
- 115 North Macedonia 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 116 Gabon 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 117 Djibouti 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 119 Montenegro 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 120 Kazakhstan 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 121 Serbia 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
More work & labour data for Iraq
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual 0.1891 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth 0.1939 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth 0.1833 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate 0.2038 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 2.31 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 65,560 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 15,931 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 50,009 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 50,640 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 100,649 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is total weekly hours worked of employed persons (ilo modelled) in Iraq?
- Total weekly hours worked of employed persons (ilo modelled) in Iraq was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2025, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest total weekly hours worked of employed persons (ilo modelled) recorded in Iraq?
- The highest recorded value was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2005.
- What is the lowest total weekly hours worked of employed persons (ilo modelled) recorded in Iraq?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2022.
- How does Iraq rank for total weekly hours worked of employed persons (ilo modelled)?
- Iraq ranks 118th out of 185 countries with data for 2025.
- Is total weekly hours worked of employed persons (ilo modelled) rising or falling in Iraq?
- Over the last ten years it is down 26.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Iraq data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Total weekly hours worked of employed persons (ILO modelled estimates), per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Total weekly hours worked of employed persons (ILO modelled estimates) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Total weekly hours worked of employed persons (ILO modelled estimates) ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Total weekly hours worked of employed persons International Labour Organization
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Total weekly hours worked of employed persons (ILO modelled estimates) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.