Total weekly hours worked of employed persons (ILO modelled) in Angola
Angola: Total weekly hours worked of employed persons (ILO modelled) was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2025. ▲ Rising
Total weekly hours worked of employed persons (ILO modelled) in Angola, 2005–2025
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
Angola recorded 0 units per US$ of GDP for total weekly hours worked of employed persons (ilo modelled) in 2025.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 12.9% on the previous year and up 27.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, total weekly hours worked of employed persons (ilo modelled) in Angola peaked at 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2020 and was at its lowest, 0 units per US$ of GDP, in 2012.
That places Angola 52nd out of 185 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 21 years of available data.
Total weekly hours worked of employed persons (ILO modelled) in Angola, year by year
| Year | units per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | — |
| 2006 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -26.4% |
| 2007 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -16.4% |
| 2008 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -23.2% |
| 2009 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +25.3% |
| 2010 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -11.2% |
| 2011 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -20.9% |
| 2012 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -8.9% |
| 2013 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +0.2% |
| 2014 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +0.6% |
| 2015 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +54.4% |
| 2016 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +74.2% |
| 2017 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -26.7% |
| 2018 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -2.2% |
| 2019 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +15.4% |
| 2020 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +34.1% |
| 2021 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -16.5% |
| 2022 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -31.7% |
| 2023 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +24.8% |
| 2024 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +6.6% |
| 2025 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -12.9% |
Angola compared with similar countries
- Angola's 0 units per US$ of GDP is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 0 units per US$ of GDP, 85% of the median. (46 countries reporting)
- Angola's 0 units per US$ of GDP is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 0 units per US$ of GDP, 49% of the median. (47 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 5 |
| 2010s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 6 |
Countries ranked near Angola
- 49 Zimbabwe 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 50 Cote d'Ivoire 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 51 Nicaragua 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 53 Kyrgyzstan 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 54 Honduras 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 55 Papua New Guinea 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
More work & labour data for Angola
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual 0.7608 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth 0.7449 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth 0.7758 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate 0.6791 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 2.8 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 61,132 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 14,914 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 76,286 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 73,759 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 150,046 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is total weekly hours worked of employed persons (ilo modelled) in Angola?
- Total weekly hours worked of employed persons (ilo modelled) in Angola was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2025, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest total weekly hours worked of employed persons (ilo modelled) recorded in Angola?
- The highest recorded value was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2020.
- What is the lowest total weekly hours worked of employed persons (ilo modelled) recorded in Angola?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2012.
- How does Angola rank for total weekly hours worked of employed persons (ilo modelled)?
- Angola ranks 52nd out of 185 countries with data for 2025.
- Is total weekly hours worked of employed persons (ilo modelled) rising or falling in Angola?
- Over the last ten years it is up 27.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Angola data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Total weekly hours worked of employed persons (ILO modelled estimates), per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Total weekly hours worked of employed persons (ILO modelled estimates) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Total weekly hours worked of employed persons (ILO modelled estimates) ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Total weekly hours worked of employed persons International Labour Organization
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Total weekly hours worked of employed persons (ILO modelled estimates) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.