Structure of labour cost by NACE Rev. 1.1 activity in Czechia

Czechia: Structure of labour cost by NACE Rev. 1.1 activity was 72.5% in 2007. ▬ Flat

Latest (2007)
72.5%
Change on year
down 0.4%
World rank
22nd
of 26 countries
All-time high
73.3%
in 1998
All-time low
72.1%
in 2002
Years of data
13
1995–2007

Structure of labour cost by NACE Rev. 1.1 activity in Czechia, 1995–2007

0204060801995200120071995: 72.9 Percentage1996: 72.8 Percentage1997: 73 Percentage1998: 73.3 Percentage1999: 72.9 Percentage2000: 72.3 Percentage2001: 72.3 Percentage2002: 72.1 Percentage2003: 72.1 Percentage2004: 72.2 Percentage2005: 72.7 Percentage2006: 72.8 Percentage2007: 72.5 Percentage

Source: Eurostat. Measured in Percentage.

Analysis

Czechia recorded 72.5% for structure of labour cost by nace rev. 1.1 activity in 2007.

The figure is down 0.4% on the previous year and down 0.7% over ten years.

Over the whole period, structure of labour cost by nace rev. 1.1 activity in Czechia peaked at 73.3% in 1998 and was at its lowest, 72.1%, in 2002.

Czechia ranks 22nd of 26 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

Structure of labour cost by NACE Rev. 1.1 activity in Czechia, year by year

Annual values for Structure of labour cost by NACE Rev. 1.1 activity in Czechia, 1995 to 2007.
Year Percentage Change
1995 72.9%
1996 72.8% -0.1%
1997 73.0% +0.3%
1998 73.3% +0.4%
1999 72.9% -0.5%
2000 72.3% -0.8%
2001 72.3% +0.0%
2002 72.1% -0.3%
2003 72.1% +0.0%
2004 72.2% +0.1%
2005 72.7% +0.7%
2006 72.8% +0.1%
2007 72.5% -0.4%

Czechia compared with similar countries

  • Czechia's 72.5% is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 75.5%, 96% of the median. (19 countries reporting)
  • Czechia's 72.5% is below the median for high income countries, which is 75.5%, 96% of the median. (19 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 73.0% 72.8% 73.3% 5
2000s 72.4% 72.1% 72.8% 8

Countries ranked near Czechia

  1. 19 Romania 73.5% compare
  2. 20 Estonia 73.4% compare
  3. 20 Estonia 73.4% compare
  4. 22 Lithuania 72.5% compare
  5. 22 Lithuania 72.5% compare
  6. 25 Hungary 70.5% compare

See the full ranking of 26 places →

More work & labour data for Czechia

All data for Czechia →

Frequently asked questions

What is structure of labour cost by nace rev. 1.1 activity in Czechia?
Structure of labour cost by nace rev. 1.1 activity in Czechia was 72.5% in 2007, according to Eurostat.
What is the highest structure of labour cost by nace rev. 1.1 activity recorded in Czechia?
The highest recorded value was 73.3% in 1998.
What is the lowest structure of labour cost by nace rev. 1.1 activity recorded in Czechia?
The lowest recorded value was 72.1% in 2002.
How does Czechia rank for structure of labour cost by nace rev. 1.1 activity?
Czechia ranks 22nd out of 26 countries with data for 2007.
Is structure of labour cost by nace rev. 1.1 activity rising or falling in Czechia?
Over the last ten years it is down 0.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Czechia data come from?
The figures come from Eurostat, published as part of Structure of labour cost by NACE Rev. 1.1 activity. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 13 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Eurostat).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Structure of labour cost by NACE Rev. 1.1 activity in Czechia. Statizoid, drawing on Eurostat. Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/structure-of-labour-cost-by-nace-rev-1-1-activity/czechia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Eurostat); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/structure-of-labour-cost-by-nace-rev-1-1-activity/czechia/">Structure of labour cost by NACE Rev. 1.1 activity in Czechia</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Structure of labour cost by NACE Rev. 1.1 activity
Unit
Percentage
Source
Eurostat
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Eurostat)
Coverage
26 places, 260 data points, 1995–2008
Last refreshed