SDG indicator 8.8.2: Level of national compliance with labour rights in Tonga
Tonga: SDG indicator 8.8.2: Level of national compliance with labour rights was 0.87 in 2024. ▬ Flat
SDG indicator 8.8.2: Level of national compliance with labour rights in Tonga, 2016–2024
Source: International Labour Organization.
Analysis
In 2024, sdg indicator 8.8.2: level of national compliance with labour rights in Tonga stood at 0.87. That is the highest value across all 9 years on record.
That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, sdg indicator 8.8.2: level of national compliance with labour rights in Tonga peaked at 0.87 in 2016 and was at its lowest, 0.87, in 2016.
Tonga ranks 133rd of 186 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
SDG indicator 8.8.2: Level of national compliance with labour rights in Tonga, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 0.87 | — |
| 2017 | 0.87 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 0.87 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 0.87 | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 0.87 | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 0.87 | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 0.87 | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 0.87 | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 0.87 | +0.0% |
Tonga compared with similar countries
- Tonga's 0.87 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 1.8, 48% of the median. (57 countries reporting)
- Tonga's 0.87 is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 2.58, 34% of the median. (27 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.87 | 0.87 | 0.87 | 4 |
| 2020s | 0.87 | 0.87 | 0.87 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Tonga
More work & labour data for Tonga
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual 0.0076 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth 0.0285 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -0.0138 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -0.0722 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 1.78 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 41.65 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 98.27 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 58.13 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 59.74 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 117.87 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is sdg indicator 8.8.2: level of national compliance with labour rights in Tonga?
- Sdg indicator 8.8.2: level of national compliance with labour rights in Tonga was 0.87 in 2024, according to International Labour Organization.
- What is the highest sdg indicator 8.8.2: level of national compliance with labour rights recorded in Tonga?
- The highest recorded value was 0.87 in 2016.
- What is the lowest sdg indicator 8.8.2: level of national compliance with labour rights recorded in Tonga?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.87 in 2016.
- How does Tonga rank for sdg indicator 8.8.2: level of national compliance with labour rights?
- Tonga ranks 133rd out of 186 countries with data for 2024.
- Is sdg indicator 8.8.2: level of national compliance with labour rights rising or falling in Tonga?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Tonga data come from?
- The figures come from International Labour Organization, published as part of SDG indicator 8.8.2: Level of national compliance with labour rights, freedom of association and collective bargaining. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under ILO Terms of Use (attribution required).
About this data
The indicator measures the level of national compliance with fundamental rights at work (freedom of association and collective bargaining, FACB) for all ILO member states based on six international ILO supervisory body textual sources and also on national legislation. It is based on the coding of textual sources against a list of evaluation criteria and then converting the coding into indicators. The indicator has a range from 0 to 10, with 0 being the best possible score (indicating higher levels of compliance with FACB rights) and 10 the worst (indicating lower levels of compliance with FACB rights). This indicator is not intended as a tool to compare compliance among ILO member States. It should specifically be noted that reporting obligations of an ILO member State to the ILO's supervisory system and thus ILO textual sources are different for ratifying and non‐ratifying ILO member States.