SDG indicator 8.8.2: Level of national compliance with labour rights in Asia and the Pacific
Asia and the Pacific: SDG indicator 8.8.2: Level of national compliance with labour rights was 6.37 in 2024. ▬ Flat
SDG indicator 8.8.2: Level of national compliance with labour rights in Asia and the Pacific, 2015–2024
Source: International Labour Organization.
Analysis
The most recent figure for sdg indicator 8.8.2: level of national compliance with labour rights in Asia and the Pacific is 6.37, measured in 2024.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 1.8% on the previous year and up 3.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, sdg indicator 8.8.2: level of national compliance with labour rights in Asia and the Pacific peaked at 6.54 in 2022 and was at its lowest, 6.07, in 2021.
That places Asia and the Pacific 10th out of 83 groups with data for 2024, putting it in the top quarter.
SDG indicator 8.8.2: Level of national compliance with labour rights in Asia and the Pacific, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 6.13 | — |
| 2016 | 6.15 | +0.3% |
| 2017 | 6.32 | +2.8% |
| 2018 | 6.35 | +0.5% |
| 2019 | 6.22 | -2.0% |
| 2020 | 6.09 | -2.1% |
| 2021 | 6.07 | -0.3% |
| 2022 | 6.54 | +7.7% |
| 2023 | 6.49 | -0.8% |
| 2024 | 6.37 | -1.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 6.23 | 6.13 | 6.35 | 5 |
| 2020s | 6.31 | 6.07 | 6.54 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Asia and the Pacific
More work & labour data for Asia and the Pacific
- Labour force (ILO modelled estimates) 2.15 million (2027)
- Labour force participation rate (ILO modelled estimates) 60.05 (2027)
- Persons outside the labour force (ILO modelled estimates) 1.43 million (2027)
- Unemployment rate (ILO modelled estimates) 4.12 (2027)
- Labour dependency ratio 1.19 (2027)
- Output per worker, GDP constant 2021 international $ at PPP 41,790 (2027)
- Output per worker, GDP constant 2015 US $ 19,789 (2027)
- Employment-to-population ratio (ILO modelled estimates) 57.58 (2027)
- Persons outside the labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+) 1.53 % change on previous year (2027)
- Labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), annual growth rate 0.7302 % change on previous year (2027)
Frequently asked questions
- What is sdg indicator 8.8.2: level of national compliance with labour rights in Asia and the Pacific?
- Sdg indicator 8.8.2: level of national compliance with labour rights in Asia and the Pacific was 6.37 in 2024, according to International Labour Organization.
- What is the highest sdg indicator 8.8.2: level of national compliance with labour rights recorded in Asia and the Pacific?
- The highest recorded value was 6.54 in 2022.
- What is the lowest sdg indicator 8.8.2: level of national compliance with labour rights recorded in Asia and the Pacific?
- The lowest recorded value was 6.07 in 2021.
- How does Asia and the Pacific rank for sdg indicator 8.8.2: level of national compliance with labour rights?
- Asia and the Pacific ranks 10th out of 83 groups with data for 2024.
- Is sdg indicator 8.8.2: level of national compliance with labour rights rising or falling in Asia and the Pacific?
- Over the last ten years it is up 3.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Asia and the Pacific data come from?
- The figures come from International Labour Organization, published as part of SDG indicator 8.8.2: Level of national compliance with labour rights, freedom of association and collective bargaining. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 10 observations, free to reuse under ILO Terms of Use (attribution required).
About this data
The indicator measures the level of national compliance with fundamental rights at work (freedom of association and collective bargaining, FACB) for all ILO member states based on six international ILO supervisory body textual sources and also on national legislation. It is based on the coding of textual sources against a list of evaluation criteria and then converting the coding into indicators. The indicator has a range from 0 to 10, with 0 being the best possible score (indicating higher levels of compliance with FACB rights) and 10 the worst (indicating lower levels of compliance with FACB rights). This indicator is not intended as a tool to compare compliance among ILO member States. It should specifically be noted that reporting obligations of an ILO member State to the ILO's supervisory system and thus ILO textual sources are different for ratifying and non‐ratifying ILO member States.