SDG indicator 8.6.1 … years not in education, employment or training in Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income

Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income: SDG indicator 8.6.1 … years not in education, employment or training was 14.26 in 2027. ▼ Falling

Latest (2027)
14.26
Change on year
up 1.1%
Rank
64th
of 87 groups
All-time high
19.97
in 2005
All-time low
13.72
in 2019
Years of data
23
2005–2027

SDG indicator 8.6.1: Proportion of youth aged 15 to 24 years not in in Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income, 2005–2027

051015202005201620272005: 202006: 19.82007: 19.52008: 19.12009: 192010: 18.32011: 17.82012: 16.92013: 16.52014: 15.82015: 15.52016: 15.12017: 14.62018: 142019: 13.72020: 152021: 142022: 13.92023: 13.72024: 13.72025: 142026: 14.12027: 14.3

Source: International Labour Organization.

Analysis

The most recent figure for sdg indicator 8.6.1: proportion of youth aged 15 to 24 years not in in Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income is 14.26, measured in 2027.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 1.1% on the previous year and down 2.6% over ten years.

Over the whole period, sdg indicator 8.6.1: proportion of youth aged 15 to 24 years not in in Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income peaked at 19.97 in 2005 and was at its lowest, 13.72, in 2019.

That places Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income 64th out of 87 groups with data for 2027, putting it in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 23 years of available data.

SDG indicator 8.6.1 … years not in education, employment or training in Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income, year by year

Annual values for SDG indicator 8.6.1: Proportion of youth aged 15 to 24 years not in education, employment or training in Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income, 2005 to 2027.
Year Value Change
2005 19.97 —
2006 19.84 -0.6%
2007 19.47 -1.9%
2008 19.15 -1.7%
2009 19.02 -0.7%
2010 18.33 -3.6%
2011 17.75 -3.1%
2012 16.87 -5.0%
2013 16.45 -2.5%
2014 15.78 -4.1%
2015 15.47 -1.9%
2016 15.13 -2.2%
2017 14.63 -3.3%
2018 14.02 -4.2%
2019 13.72 -2.1%
2020 14.96 +9.0%
2021 14.03 -6.2%
2022 13.91 -0.9%
2023 13.74 -1.2%
2024 13.74 -0.1%
2025 14.03 +2.2%
2026 14.1 +0.5%
2027 14.26 +1.1%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 19.49 19.02 19.97 5
2010s 15.81 13.72 18.33 10
2020s 14.1 13.74 14.96 8

Countries ranked near Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income

  1. 61 Rwanda 15.29 compare
  2. 62 Israel 15.27 compare
  3. 63 Argentina 15.21 compare
  4. 64 Panama 15.09 compare
  5. 65 Myanmar 15.02 compare
  6. 66 Bosnia and Herzegovina 14.47 compare
  7. 67 United Kingdom 14.4 compare

See the full ranking of 210 places →

More work & labour data for Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income

All data for Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income →

Frequently asked questions

What is sdg indicator 8.6.1: proportion of youth aged 15 to 24 years not in in Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income?
Sdg indicator 8.6.1: proportion of youth aged 15 to 24 years not in in Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income was 14.26 in 2027, according to International Labour Organization.
What is the highest sdg indicator 8.6.1: proportion of youth aged 15 to 24 years not in recorded in Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income?
The highest recorded value was 19.97 in 2005.
What is the lowest sdg indicator 8.6.1: proportion of youth aged 15 to 24 years not in recorded in Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income?
The lowest recorded value was 13.72 in 2019.
How does Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income rank for sdg indicator 8.6.1: proportion of youth aged 15 to 24 years not in?
Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income ranks 64th out of 87 groups with data for 2027.
Is sdg indicator 8.6.1: proportion of youth aged 15 to 24 years not in rising or falling in Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income?
Over the last ten years it is down 2.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income data come from?
The figures come from International Labour Organization, published as part of SDG indicator 8.6.1: Proportion of youth aged 15 to 24 years not in education, employment or training. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 23 observations, free to reuse under ILO Terms of Use (attribution required).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

SDG indicator 8.6.1: Proportion of youth aged 15 to 24 years not in in Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income. Statizoid, drawing on International Labour Organization. Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/sdg-indicator-8-6-1-proportion-of-youth-aged-15-to-24-years-not-in-education-employment/asia-and-the-pacific-upper-middle-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under ILO Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/sdg-indicator-8-6-1-proportion-of-youth-aged-15-to-24-years-not-in-education-employment/asia-and-the-pacific-upper-middle-income/">SDG indicator 8.6.1: Proportion of youth aged 15 to 24 years not in in Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
SDG indicator 8.6.1: Proportion of youth aged 15 to 24 years not in education, employment or training
Source
International Labour Organization
Licence
ILO Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
210 places, 4,103 data points, 2000–2027
Last refreshed

Data may differ from nationally reported figures and the Global SDG Indicators Database due to differences in sources and/or reference years. The share of youth not in employment, education, or training (also known as the NEET rate) conveys the number of young persons not in education, employment or training as a percentage of the total youth population. It provides a measure of youth who are outside the educational system, not in training and not in employment, and thus serves as a broader measure of potential youth labour market entrants than youth unemployment, since it also includes young persons outside the labour force not in education or training. This indicator is also a better measure of the current universe of potential youth labour market entrants compared to the youth inactivity rate, as the latter includes those youth who are not in the labour force and are in education, and thus cannot be considered currently available for work. For more information, refer to the Labour Market-related SDG Indicators (ILOSDG) database description.