Population in the 1st quintile (poorest) receiving All Social in Belarus
Belarus: Population in the 1st quintile (poorest) receiving All Social was 0.0% in 2019. ◆ Volatile
Population in the 1st quintile (poorest) receiving All Social in Belarus, 2008–2019
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
Belarus recorded 0.0% for population in the 1st quintile (poorest) receiving all social in 2019. That is the lowest value across all 11 years on record.
Over the whole period, population in the 1st quintile (poorest) receiving all social in Belarus peaked at 0.1% in 2008 and was at its lowest, 0.0%, in 2009.
That places Belarus 17th out of 40 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Population in the 1st quintile (poorest) receiving All Social in Belarus, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 0.1% | — |
| 2009 | 0.0% | -100.0% |
| 2010 | 0.0% | — |
| 2012 | 0.0% | — |
| 2013 | 0.0% | — |
| 2014 | 0.0% | — |
| 2015 | 0.0% | — |
| 2016 | 0.0% | — |
| 2017 | 0.0% | — |
| 2018 | 0.0% | — |
| 2019 | 0.0% | — |
Belarus compared with similar countries
- Belarus's 0.0% is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0.1%. (14 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 2 |
| 2010s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 9 |
Countries ranked near Belarus
- 14 Argentina 0.1% compare
- 15 Brazil 0.0% compare
- 16 Türkiye 0.0% compare
- 17 Bolivia, Plurinational State of 0.0%
- 17 Burkina Faso 0.0%
- 17 Colombia 0.0% compare
- 17 Côte d'Ivoire 0.0% compare
- 17 Dominican Republic 0.0%
- 17 Ecuador 0.0% compare
- 17 El Salvador 0.0% compare
- 17 Georgia 0.0%
- 17 Honduras 0.0%
- 17 Kazakhstan 0.0%
- 17 Kosovo 0.0%
- 17 Malawi 0.0%
- 17 Mexico 0.0%
- 17 Mongolia 0.0% compare
- 17 Paraguay 0.0%
- 17 Peru 0.0%
- 17 Serbia 0.0% compare
- 17 South Africa 0.0%
- 17 Sri Lanka 0.0%
- 17 Thailand 0.0%
- 17 Ukraine 0.0% compare
- 17 Viet Nam 0.0% compare
- 17 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 0.0%
More work & labour data for Belarus
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -1.15 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -1.12 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -1.18 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.98 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate -0.0716 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 7,566 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 1,004 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 2,235 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 2,116 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 4,351 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is population in the 1st quintile (poorest) receiving all social in Belarus?
- Population in the 1st quintile (poorest) receiving all social in Belarus was 0.0% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest population in the 1st quintile (poorest) receiving all social recorded in Belarus?
- The highest recorded value was 0.1% in 2008.
- What is the lowest population in the 1st quintile (poorest) receiving all social recorded in Belarus?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0% in 2009.
- How does Belarus rank for population in the 1st quintile (poorest) receiving all social?
- Belarus ranks 17th out of 40 countries with data for 2019.
- Where does this Belarus data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Population in the 1st quintile (poorest) receiving All Social Insurance and Labor Market (%) -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Percentage of population only receiving All Social Insurance and Labor Market programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)