Population in the 1st quintile (poorest) only receiving All Social in Brazil
Brazil: Population in the 1st quintile (poorest) only receiving All Social was 5.2% in 2022. ▼ Falling
Population in the 1st quintile (poorest) only receiving All Social in Brazil, 2006–2022
Source: ASPIRE. Measured in %.
Analysis
The most recent figure for population in the 1st quintile (poorest) only receiving all social in Brazil is 5.2%, measured in 2022.
The figure is up 45.0% on the previous year and down 27.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, population in the 1st quintile (poorest) only receiving all social in Brazil peaked at 7.2% in 2012 and was at its lowest, 2.8%, in 2020.
That places Brazil 16th out of 40 countries with data for 2022, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 12 years of available data.
Population in the 1st quintile (poorest) only receiving All Social in Brazil, year by year
| Year | % | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2006 | 5.4% | — |
| 2009 | 6.1% | +14.6% |
| 2011 | 7.0% | +14.4% |
| 2012 | 7.2% | +1.8% |
| 2015 | 5.1% | -28.6% |
| 2016 | 5.1% | -0.7% |
| 2017 | 5.6% | +10.4% |
| 2018 | 5.7% | +2.1% |
| 2019 | 5.8% | +1.1% |
| 2020 | 2.8% | -50.9% |
| 2021 | 3.6% | +26.6% |
| 2022 | 5.2% | +45.0% |
Brazil compared with similar countries
- Brazil's 5.2% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 2.1%, 2.5× the median. (25 countries reporting)
- Brazil's 5.2% is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 1.3%, 4.0× the median. (15 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5.8% | 5.4% | 6.1% | 2 |
| 2010s | 5.9% | 5.1% | 7.2% | 7 |
| 2020s | 3.9% | 2.8% | 5.2% | 3 |
Countries ranked near Brazil
More work & labour data for Brazil
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -0.7328 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -0.7065 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -0.7581 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.74 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 0.1001 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 215,063 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 17,625 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 82,304 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 81,060 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 163,364 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is population in the 1st quintile (poorest) only receiving all social in Brazil?
- Population in the 1st quintile (poorest) only receiving all social in Brazil was 5.2% in 2022, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest population in the 1st quintile (poorest) only receiving all social recorded in Brazil?
- The highest recorded value was 7.2% in 2012.
- What is the lowest population in the 1st quintile (poorest) only receiving all social recorded in Brazil?
- The lowest recorded value was 2.8% in 2020.
- How does Brazil rank for population in the 1st quintile (poorest) only receiving all social?
- Brazil ranks 16th out of 40 countries with data for 2022.
- Is population in the 1st quintile (poorest) only receiving all social rising or falling in Brazil?
- Over the last ten years it is down 27.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Brazil data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Population in the 1st quintile (poorest) only receiving All Social Insurance (%). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Percentage of population only receiving All Social Insurance programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)