Population in the 1st quintile (poorest) only receiving All Social in Belarus
Belarus: Population in the 1st quintile (poorest) only receiving All Social was 14.4% in 2019. ▬ Flat
Latest (2019)
14.4%
Change on year
up 11.7%
World rank
11th
of 38 countries
All-time high
18.7%
in 2015
All-time low
10.4%
in 2017
Years of data
11
2008–2019
Population in the 1st quintile (poorest) only receiving All Social in Belarus, 2008–2019
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
In 2019, population in the 1st quintile (poorest) only receiving all social in Belarus stood at 14.4%.
The figure is up 11.7% on the previous year and up 34.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, population in the 1st quintile (poorest) only receiving all social in Belarus peaked at 18.7% in 2015 and was at its lowest, 10.4%, in 2017.
Belarus ranks 11th of 38 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
Population in the 1st quintile (poorest) only receiving All Social in Belarus, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 13.0% | — |
| 2009 | 10.7% | -17.4% |
| 2010 | 13.8% | +28.5% |
| 2012 | 16.1% | +16.4% |
| 2013 | 16.5% | +2.3% |
| 2014 | 11.3% | -31.3% |
| 2015 | 18.7% | +65.2% |
| 2016 | 11.4% | -38.9% |
| 2017 | 10.4% | -9.2% |
| 2018 | 12.9% | +24.5% |
| 2019 | 14.4% | +11.7% |
Belarus compared with similar countries
- Belarus's 14.4% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0.7%, 21.2× the median. (23 countries reporting)
- Belarus's 14.4% is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 17.3%, 83% of the median. (13 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 11.9% | 10.7% | 13.0% | 2 |
| 2010s | 13.9% | 10.4% | 18.7% | 9 |
Countries ranked near Belarus
More work & labour data for Belarus
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -1.15 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -1.12 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -1.18 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.98 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate -0.0716 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 7,566 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 1,004 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 2,235 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 2,116 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 4,351 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is population in the 1st quintile (poorest) only receiving all social in Belarus?
- Population in the 1st quintile (poorest) only receiving all social in Belarus was 14.4% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest population in the 1st quintile (poorest) only receiving all social recorded in Belarus?
- The highest recorded value was 18.7% in 2015.
- What is the lowest population in the 1st quintile (poorest) only receiving all social recorded in Belarus?
- The lowest recorded value was 10.4% in 2017.
- How does Belarus rank for population in the 1st quintile (poorest) only receiving all social?
- Belarus ranks 11th out of 38 countries with data for 2019.
- Is population in the 1st quintile (poorest) only receiving all social rising or falling in Belarus?
- Over the last ten years it is up 34.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Belarus data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Population in the 1st quintile (poorest) only receiving All Social Insurance (%) -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Percentage of population only receiving All Social Insurance programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)