Population in the 1st quintile (poorest) only receiving All Social in Brazil
Brazil: Population in the 1st quintile (poorest) only receiving All Social was 7.5% in 2022. ▼ Falling
Population in the 1st quintile (poorest) only receiving All Social in Brazil, 2006–2022
Source: ASPIRE. Measured in %, preT.
Analysis
In 2022, population in the 1st quintile (poorest) only receiving all social in Brazil stood at 7.5%.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 15.1% on the previous year and down 44.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, population in the 1st quintile (poorest) only receiving all social in Brazil peaked at 13.8% in 2011 and was at its lowest, 2.1%, in 2020.
Brazil ranks 17th of 40 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 12 years of available data.
Population in the 1st quintile (poorest) only receiving All Social in Brazil, year by year
| Year | %, preT | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2006 | 11.7% | — |
| 2009 | 12.3% | +5.5% |
| 2011 | 13.8% | +12.1% |
| 2012 | 13.3% | -3.5% |
| 2015 | 11.0% | -17.6% |
| 2016 | 9.4% | -14.6% |
| 2017 | 10.1% | +8.1% |
| 2018 | 10.4% | +2.4% |
| 2019 | 10.0% | -3.6% |
| 2020 | 2.1% | -79.3% |
| 2021 | 6.5% | +212.7% |
| 2022 | 7.5% | +15.1% |
Brazil compared with similar countries
- Brazil's 7.5% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 3.2%, 2.4× the median. (25 countries reporting)
- Brazil's 7.5% is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 1.4%, 5.3× the median. (15 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 12.0% | 11.7% | 12.3% | 2 |
| 2010s | 11.1% | 9.4% | 13.8% | 7 |
| 2020s | 5.3% | 2.1% | 7.5% | 3 |
Countries ranked near Brazil
More work & labour data for Brazil
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -0.7328 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -0.7065 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -0.7581 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.74 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 0.1001 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 215,063 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 17,625 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 82,304 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 81,060 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 163,364 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is population in the 1st quintile (poorest) only receiving all social in Brazil?
- Population in the 1st quintile (poorest) only receiving all social in Brazil was 7.5% in 2022, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest population in the 1st quintile (poorest) only receiving all social recorded in Brazil?
- The highest recorded value was 13.8% in 2011.
- What is the lowest population in the 1st quintile (poorest) only receiving all social recorded in Brazil?
- The lowest recorded value was 2.1% in 2020.
- How does Brazil rank for population in the 1st quintile (poorest) only receiving all social?
- Brazil ranks 17th out of 40 countries with data for 2022.
- Is population in the 1st quintile (poorest) only receiving all social rising or falling in Brazil?
- Over the last ten years it is down 44.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Brazil data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Population in the 1st quintile (poorest) only receiving All Social Insurance (%, preT). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Percentage of population only receiving All Social Insurance programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)