Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, per unit of GDP in Lithuania
Lithuania: Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, per unit of GDP was 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, per unit of GDP in Lithuania, 1995–2025
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in 1000 No per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
In 2025, population - est. & proj. — urban population, per unit of gdp in Lithuania stood at 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP. That is the lowest value across all 31 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 10.3% on the previous year and down 57.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, population - est. & proj. — urban population, per unit of gdp in Lithuania peaked at 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP in 1995 and was at its lowest, 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP, in 2025.
Lithuania ranks 146th of 187 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, per unit of GDP in Lithuania, year by year
| Year | 1000 No per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1995 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1996 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -6.7% |
| 1997 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -17.7% |
| 1998 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -10.6% |
| 1999 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | +1.6% |
| 2000 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -5.4% |
| 2001 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -6.6% |
| 2002 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -15.0% |
| 2003 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -24.8% |
| 2004 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -18.2% |
| 2005 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -13.8% |
| 2006 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -14.3% |
| 2007 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -25.1% |
| 2008 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -18.0% |
| 2009 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | +25.7% |
| 2010 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | +0.8% |
| 2011 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -16.4% |
| 2012 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -0.1% |
| 2013 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -8.8% |
| 2014 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -5.1% |
| 2015 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | +15.3% |
| 2016 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -3.9% |
| 2017 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -10.4% |
| 2018 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -12.2% |
| 2019 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -1.7% |
| 2020 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -4.1% |
| 2021 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -14.5% |
| 2022 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -5.2% |
| 2023 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -12.2% |
| 2024 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -6.1% |
| 2025 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -10.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 5 |
| 2000s | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 6 |
Countries ranked near Lithuania
More work & labour data for Lithuania
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -1.28 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -1.24 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -1.32 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -2.22 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate -0.1248 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 1,880 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 526.79 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 615.89 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 592.78 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 1,209 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is population - est. & proj. — urban population, per unit of gdp in Lithuania?
- Population - est. & proj. — urban population, per unit of gdp in Lithuania was 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP in 2025, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest population - est. & proj. — urban population, per unit of gdp recorded in Lithuania?
- The highest recorded value was 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP in 1995.
- What is the lowest population - est. & proj. — urban population, per unit of gdp recorded in Lithuania?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP in 2025.
- How does Lithuania rank for population - est. & proj. — urban population, per unit of gdp?
- Lithuania ranks 146th out of 187 countries with data for 2025.
- Is population - est. & proj. — urban population, per unit of gdp rising or falling in Lithuania?
- Over the last ten years it is down 57.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Lithuania data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 31 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.