Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, per unit of GDP in Congo
Congo: Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, per unit of GDP was 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, per unit of GDP in Congo, 1960–2025
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in 1000 No per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
The most recent figure for population - est. & proj. — urban population, per unit of gdp in Congo is 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP, measured in 2025.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 0.5% on the previous year and up 5.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, population - est. & proj. — urban population, per unit of gdp in Congo peaked at 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP in 1960 and was at its lowest, 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP, in 2012.
That places Congo 23rd out of 187 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, per unit of GDP in Congo, year by year
| Year | 1000 No per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1960 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1961 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -8.9% |
| 1962 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -4.4% |
| 1963 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | +1.5% |
| 1964 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -2.6% |
| 1965 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -1.7% |
| 1966 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -5.6% |
| 1967 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -2.4% |
| 1968 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -0.8% |
| 1969 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -0.4% |
| 1970 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | +1.3% |
| 1971 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -10.3% |
| 1972 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -17.5% |
| 1973 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -20.3% |
| 1974 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -2.6% |
| 1975 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -19.7% |
| 1976 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | +6.9% |
| 1977 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | +3.6% |
| 1978 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -8.5% |
| 1979 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -23.0% |
| 1980 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -26.2% |
| 1981 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -10.2% |
| 1982 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -3.2% |
| 1983 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | +8.1% |
| 1984 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | +0.2% |
| 1985 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | +5.8% |
| 1986 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | +21.1% |
| 1987 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -16.6% |
| 1988 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | +7.6% |
| 1989 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -4.1% |
| 1990 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -11.6% |
| 1991 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | +6.4% |
| 1992 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -3.8% |
| 1993 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | +13.2% |
| 1994 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | +57.1% |
| 1995 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -13.4% |
| 1996 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -13.7% |
| 1997 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | +13.5% |
| 1998 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | +23.6% |
| 1999 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -14.1% |
| 2000 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -24.4% |
| 2001 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | +19.6% |
| 2002 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -4.6% |
| 2003 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -10.3% |
| 2004 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -22.0% |
| 2005 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -27.2% |
| 2006 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -14.2% |
| 2007 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -4.2% |
| 2008 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -21.4% |
| 2009 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | +24.7% |
| 2010 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -23.2% |
| 2011 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -13.0% |
| 2012 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -8.5% |
| 2013 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | +1.8% |
| 2014 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | +3.5% |
| 2015 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | +48.8% |
| 2016 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | +17.5% |
| 2017 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -4.5% |
| 2018 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -17.2% |
| 2019 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | +9.2% |
| 2020 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | +25.9% |
| 2021 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -20.1% |
| 2022 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -3.2% |
| 2023 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | +6.6% |
| 2024 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | +0.6% |
| 2025 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -0.5% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1970s | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1980s | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1990s | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2000s | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 6 |
Countries ranked near Congo
- 20 Malawi 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP compare
- 21 Burkina Faso 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP compare
- 22 Benin 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP compare
- 24 Mauritania 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP compare
- 25 Palestine, State of 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP compare
- 26 Senegal 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP compare
More work & labour data for Congo
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual 0.6949 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth 0.6877 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth 0.7017 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate 0.2906 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 2.46 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 9,208 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 2,302 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 10,131 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 9,894 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 20,026 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is population - est. & proj. — urban population, per unit of gdp in Congo?
- Population - est. & proj. — urban population, per unit of gdp in Congo was 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP in 2025, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest population - est. & proj. — urban population, per unit of gdp recorded in Congo?
- The highest recorded value was 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP in 1960.
- What is the lowest population - est. & proj. — urban population, per unit of gdp recorded in Congo?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP in 2012.
- How does Congo rank for population - est. & proj. — urban population, per unit of gdp?
- Congo ranks 23rd out of 187 countries with data for 2025.
- Is population - est. & proj. — urban population, per unit of gdp rising or falling in Congo?
- Over the last ten years it is up 5.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Congo data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 66 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.