Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, per unit of GDP in Bermuda
Bermuda: Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, per unit of GDP was 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, per unit of GDP in Bermuda, 1960–2024
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in 1000 No per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
In 2024, population - est. & proj. — urban population, per unit of gdp in Bermuda stood at 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP. That is the lowest value across all 65 years on record.
The figure is down 6.6% on the previous year and down 32.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, population - est. & proj. — urban population, per unit of gdp in Bermuda peaked at 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP in 1960 and was at its lowest, 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP, in 2024.
Bermuda ranks 180th of 187 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, per unit of GDP in Bermuda, year by year
| Year | 1000 No per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1960 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1961 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -3.5% |
| 1962 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -3.4% |
| 1963 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -0.5% |
| 1964 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -8.8% |
| 1965 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -4.4% |
| 1966 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -13.6% |
| 1967 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -13.6% |
| 1968 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -9.1% |
| 1969 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -8.0% |
| 1970 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -10.5% |
| 1971 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -10.8% |
| 1972 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -9.3% |
| 1973 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -11.8% |
| 1974 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -12.9% |
| 1975 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -8.6% |
| 1976 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -10.0% |
| 1977 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -12.9% |
| 1978 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -5.4% |
| 1979 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -7.4% |
| 1980 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -15.1% |
| 1981 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -16.5% |
| 1982 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -5.3% |
| 1983 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -11.1% |
| 1984 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -9.2% |
| 1985 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -4.5% |
| 1986 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -10.8% |
| 1987 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -8.9% |
| 1988 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -7.8% |
| 1989 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -5.1% |
| 1990 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -5.1% |
| 1991 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -2.0% |
| 1992 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -2.1% |
| 1993 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -7.2% |
| 1994 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -2.0% |
| 1995 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -7.6% |
| 1996 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -24.3% |
| 1997 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -7.7% |
| 1998 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -5.9% |
| 1999 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -5.4% |
| 2000 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -4.1% |
| 2001 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -5.0% |
| 2002 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -6.1% |
| 2003 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -5.6% |
| 2004 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -6.4% |
| 2005 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -7.8% |
| 2006 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -20.8% |
| 2007 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -9.4% |
| 2008 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -3.5% |
| 2009 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | +4.3% |
| 2010 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -0.2% |
| 2011 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | +4.5% |
| 2012 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -1.7% |
| 2013 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -2.0% |
| 2014 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | +0.2% |
| 2015 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -4.2% |
| 2016 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -4.1% |
| 2017 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -3.9% |
| 2018 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -1.6% |
| 2019 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -3.0% |
| 2020 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | +7.4% |
| 2021 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -5.8% |
| 2022 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -6.3% |
| 2023 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -9.8% |
| 2024 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -6.6% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1970s | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1980s | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1990s | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2000s | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 5 |
Countries ranked near Bermuda
- 177 Iceland 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP compare
- 178 Cayman Islands 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP compare
- 179 Guyana 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP compare
- 181 Switzerland 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP compare
- 182 Isle of Man 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP compare
- 183 Luxembourg 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP compare
More work & labour data for Bermuda
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -0.8892 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 53.38 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 0 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 18.42 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 17.25 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 35.67 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate -0.6736 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -0.872 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -0.9133 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, per capita 0.0005 1000 No per person (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is population - est. & proj. — urban population, per unit of gdp in Bermuda?
- Population - est. & proj. — urban population, per unit of gdp in Bermuda was 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest population - est. & proj. — urban population, per unit of gdp recorded in Bermuda?
- The highest recorded value was 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP in 1960.
- What is the lowest population - est. & proj. — urban population, per unit of gdp recorded in Bermuda?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP in 2024.
- How does Bermuda rank for population - est. & proj. — urban population, per unit of gdp?
- Bermuda ranks 180th out of 187 countries with data for 2024.
- Is population - est. & proj. — urban population, per unit of gdp rising or falling in Bermuda?
- Over the last ten years it is down 32.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Bermuda data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 65 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.