Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, per square in Chile
Chile: Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, per square was 0.0133 1000 No per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising
Latest (2023)
0.0133 1000 No per square kilometre
Change on year
up 0.5%
World rank
154th
of 191 countries
All-time high
0.0133 1000 No per square kilometre
in 2023
All-time low
0.0056 1000 No per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, per square in Chile, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in 1000 No per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for population - est. & proj. — total population - female, per square in Chile is 0.0133 1000 No per square kilometre, measured in 2023. That is the highest value across all 63 years on record.
That represents a change of up 0.5% on the previous year and up 11.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, population - est. & proj. — total population - female, per square in Chile peaked at 0.0133 1000 No per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 0.0056 1000 No per square kilometre, in 1961.
Chile ranks 154th of 191 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 63 years of available data.
Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, per square in Chile, year by year
| Year | 1000 No per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0056 1000 No per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.0057 1000 No per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 1963 | 0.0058 1000 No per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 1964 | 0.0059 1000 No per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 1965 | 0.0061 1000 No per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 1966 | 0.0062 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 1967 | 0.0063 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 1968 | 0.0064 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 1969 | 0.0065 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 1970 | 0.0066 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 1971 | 0.0067 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 1972 | 0.0068 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 1973 | 0.007 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 1974 | 0.0071 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 1975 | 0.0072 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 1976 | 0.0073 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 1977 | 0.0074 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 1978 | 0.0075 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 1979 | 0.0076 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 1980 | 0.0078 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 1981 | 0.0079 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 1982 | 0.008 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 1983 | 0.0081 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 1984 | 0.0082 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 1985 | 0.0084 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 1986 | 0.0085 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 1987 | 0.0086 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 1988 | 0.0088 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 1989 | 0.0089 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 1990 | 0.0091 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 1991 | 0.0092 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 1992 | 0.0094 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 1993 | 0.0095 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 1994 | 0.0097 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 1995 | 0.0098 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 1996 | 0.01 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 1997 | 0.0101 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 1998 | 0.0102 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.3% |
| 1999 | 0.0104 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.3% |
| 2000 | 0.0105 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.2% |
| 2001 | 0.0106 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.2% |
| 2002 | 0.0107 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 2003 | 0.0108 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 2004 | 0.0109 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 2005 | 0.0111 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 2006 | 0.0112 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 2007 | 0.0113 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 2008 | 0.0114 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 2009 | 0.0115 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 2010 | 0.0116 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 2011 | 0.0117 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 2012 | 0.0118 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 2013 | 0.012 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 2014 | 0.0121 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.2% |
| 2015 | 0.0122 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 2016 | 0.0124 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 2017 | 0.0126 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 2018 | 0.0128 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 2019 | 0.013 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 2020 | 0.0131 1000 No per square kilometre | +0.9% |
| 2021 | 0.0132 1000 No per square kilometre | +0.5% |
| 2022 | 0.0132 1000 No per square kilometre | +0.5% |
| 2023 | 0.0133 1000 No per square kilometre | +0.5% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.006 1000 No per square kilometre | 0.0056 1000 No per square kilometre | 0.0065 1000 No per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.0071 1000 No per square kilometre | 0.0066 1000 No per square kilometre | 0.0076 1000 No per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.0083 1000 No per square kilometre | 0.0078 1000 No per square kilometre | 0.0089 1000 No per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.0097 1000 No per square kilometre | 0.0091 1000 No per square kilometre | 0.0104 1000 No per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.011 1000 No per square kilometre | 0.0105 1000 No per square kilometre | 0.0115 1000 No per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0122 1000 No per square kilometre | 0.0116 1000 No per square kilometre | 0.013 1000 No per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0132 1000 No per square kilometre | 0.0131 1000 No per square kilometre | 0.0133 1000 No per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Chile
- 151 Zambia 0.0141 1000 No per square kilometre compare
- 152 Solomon Islands 0.014 1000 No per square kilometre compare
- 153 Sudan 0.0135 1000 No per square kilometre compare
- 155 Peru 0.0133 1000 No per square kilometre compare
- 156 Vanuatu 0.013 1000 No per square kilometre compare
- 157 Sweden 0.0129 1000 No per square kilometre compare
More work & labour data for Chile
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -1.14 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -1.14 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -1.15 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.62 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 0.2334 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 19,028 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 1,690 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 6,735 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 6,695 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 13,431 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is population - est. & proj. — total population - female, per square in Chile?
- Population - est. & proj. — total population - female, per square in Chile was 0.0133 1000 No per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest population - est. & proj. — total population - female, per square recorded in Chile?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0133 1000 No per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest population - est. & proj. — total population - female, per square recorded in Chile?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0056 1000 No per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Chile rank for population - est. & proj. — total population - female, per square?
- Chile ranks 154th out of 191 countries with data for 2023.
- Is population - est. & proj. — total population - female, per square rising or falling in Chile?
- Over the last ten years it is up 11.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Chile data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.