Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, per unit in World
World: Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, per unit was 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, per unit in World, 1960–2025
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in 1000 No per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
The most recent figure for population - est. & proj. — total population - both sexes, per unit in World is 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP, measured in 2025. That is the lowest value across all 66 years on record.
The figure is down 4.8% on the previous year and down 29.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, population - est. & proj. — total population - both sexes, per unit in World peaked at 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP in 1960 and was at its lowest, 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP, in 2025.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, per unit in World, year by year
| Year | 1000 No per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1960 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1961 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -3.8% |
| 1962 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -4.8% |
| 1963 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -5.5% |
| 1964 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -6.7% |
| 1965 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -6.3% |
| 1966 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -5.8% |
| 1967 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -3.9% |
| 1968 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -5.6% |
| 1969 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -7.6% |
| 1970 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -6.9% |
| 1971 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -7.7% |
| 1972 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -11.7% |
| 1973 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -16.6% |
| 1974 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -11.8% |
| 1975 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -8.5% |
| 1976 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -6.3% |
| 1977 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -10.0% |
| 1978 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -14.1% |
| 1979 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -12.0% |
| 1980 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -9.7% |
| 1981 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -1.5% |
| 1982 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | +2.9% |
| 1983 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -0.3% |
| 1984 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -2.0% |
| 1985 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -2.8% |
| 1986 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -13.7% |
| 1987 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -10.6% |
| 1988 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -8.9% |
| 1989 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -2.5% |
| 1990 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -9.4% |
| 1991 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -2.6% |
| 1992 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -4.9% |
| 1993 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -0.2% |
| 1994 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -5.7% |
| 1995 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -9.1% |
| 1996 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -0.9% |
| 1997 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | +1.8% |
| 1998 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | +1.9% |
| 1999 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -1.9% |
| 2000 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -2.0% |
| 2001 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | +2.0% |
| 2002 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -2.4% |
| 2003 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -9.6% |
| 2004 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -10.1% |
| 2005 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -6.5% |
| 2006 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -6.6% |
| 2007 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -10.1% |
| 2008 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -7.8% |
| 2009 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | +6.8% |
| 2010 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -7.6% |
| 2011 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -8.9% |
| 2012 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -0.9% |
| 2013 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -1.5% |
| 2014 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -1.4% |
| 2015 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | +7.1% |
| 2016 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -0.5% |
| 2017 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -5.0% |
| 2018 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -4.9% |
| 2019 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -0.6% |
| 2020 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | +3.8% |
| 2021 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -11.8% |
| 2022 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -3.2% |
| 2023 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -3.3% |
| 2024 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -3.0% |
| 2025 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -4.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1970s | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1980s | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1990s | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2000s | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 6 |
Countries ranked near World
- 1 Burundi 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP compare
- 2 Afghanistan 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP compare
- 3 Central African Republic 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP compare
- 4 Madagascar 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP compare
More work & labour data for World
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -0.1226 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -0.1316 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -0.1143 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -0.688 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 1.1 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 6.68 million 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 3.09 million 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 5.10 million 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 5.08 million 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 10.18 million 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is population - est. & proj. — total population - both sexes, per unit in World?
- Population - est. & proj. — total population - both sexes, per unit in World was 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP in 2025, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest population - est. & proj. — total population - both sexes, per unit recorded in World?
- The highest recorded value was 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP in 1960.
- What is the lowest population - est. & proj. — total population - both sexes, per unit recorded in World?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP in 2025.
- How does World rank for population - est. & proj. — total population - both sexes, per unit?
- World ranks 1st out of 1 groups with data for 2025.
- Is population - est. & proj. — total population - both sexes, per unit rising or falling in World?
- Over the last ten years it is down 29.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this World data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 66 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.