Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, per square in Suriname
Suriname: Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, per square was 0.0039 1000 No per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising
Latest (2023)
0.0039 1000 No per square kilometre
Change on year
up 0.9%
World rank
185th
of 191 countries
All-time high
0.0039 1000 No per square kilometre
in 2023
All-time low
0.0017 1000 No per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, per square in Suriname, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in 1000 No per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for population - est. & proj. — total population - both sexes, per square in Suriname is 0.0039 1000 No per square kilometre, measured in 2023. That is the highest value across all 63 years on record.
That represents a change of up 0.9% on the previous year and up 10.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, population - est. & proj. — total population - both sexes, per square in Suriname peaked at 0.0039 1000 No per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 0.0017 1000 No per square kilometre, in 1961.
Suriname ranks 185th of 191 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 63 years of available data.
Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, per square in Suriname, year by year
| Year | 1000 No per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0017 1000 No per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.0018 1000 No per square kilometre | +4.1% |
| 1963 | 0.0019 1000 No per square kilometre | +4.6% |
| 1964 | 0.0019 1000 No per square kilometre | +4.0% |
| 1965 | 0.002 1000 No per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 1966 | 0.0021 1000 No per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 1967 | 0.0021 1000 No per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 1968 | 0.0022 1000 No per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 1969 | 0.0023 1000 No per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 1970 | 0.0024 1000 No per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 1971 | 0.0024 1000 No per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 1972 | 0.0025 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 1973 | 0.0025 1000 No per square kilometre | -0.4% |
| 1974 | 0.0025 1000 No per square kilometre | -0.5% |
| 1975 | 0.0024 1000 No per square kilometre | -0.6% |
| 1976 | 0.0024 1000 No per square kilometre | -0.7% |
| 1977 | 0.0024 1000 No per square kilometre | -0.8% |
| 1978 | 0.0024 1000 No per square kilometre | -0.9% |
| 1979 | 0.0024 1000 No per square kilometre | -1.0% |
| 1980 | 0.0023 1000 No per square kilometre | -0.6% |
| 1981 | 0.0023 1000 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1982 | 0.0023 1000 No per square kilometre | +0.3% |
| 1983 | 0.0024 1000 No per square kilometre | +0.6% |
| 1984 | 0.0024 1000 No per square kilometre | +0.9% |
| 1985 | 0.0024 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.3% |
| 1986 | 0.0024 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 1987 | 0.0025 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.2% |
| 1988 | 0.0025 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.3% |
| 1989 | 0.0025 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 1990 | 0.0026 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 1991 | 0.0026 1000 No per square kilometre | +0.6% |
| 1992 | 0.0026 1000 No per square kilometre | +0.6% |
| 1993 | 0.0026 1000 No per square kilometre | +0.4% |
| 1994 | 0.0026 1000 No per square kilometre | +0.7% |
| 1995 | 0.0027 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 1996 | 0.0027 1000 No per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 1997 | 0.0028 1000 No per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 1998 | 0.0028 1000 No per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 1999 | 0.0029 1000 No per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 2000 | 0.003 1000 No per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 2001 | 0.003 1000 No per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 2002 | 0.0031 1000 No per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 2003 | 0.0032 1000 No per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 2004 | 0.0032 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 2005 | 0.0032 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 2006 | 0.0033 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 2007 | 0.0033 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 2008 | 0.0033 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.2% |
| 2009 | 0.0034 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.2% |
| 2010 | 0.0034 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.2% |
| 2011 | 0.0035 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.2% |
| 2012 | 0.0035 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 2013 | 0.0035 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 2014 | 0.0036 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 2015 | 0.0036 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 2016 | 0.0037 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 2017 | 0.0037 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 2018 | 0.0037 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 2019 | 0.0038 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 2020 | 0.0038 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 2021 | 0.0038 1000 No per square kilometre | +0.9% |
| 2022 | 0.0039 1000 No per square kilometre | +0.9% |
| 2023 | 0.0039 1000 No per square kilometre | +0.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.002 1000 No per square kilometre | 0.0017 1000 No per square kilometre | 0.0023 1000 No per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.0024 1000 No per square kilometre | 0.0024 1000 No per square kilometre | 0.0025 1000 No per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.0024 1000 No per square kilometre | 0.0023 1000 No per square kilometre | 0.0025 1000 No per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.0027 1000 No per square kilometre | 0.0026 1000 No per square kilometre | 0.0029 1000 No per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.0032 1000 No per square kilometre | 0.003 1000 No per square kilometre | 0.0034 1000 No per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0036 1000 No per square kilometre | 0.0034 1000 No per square kilometre | 0.0038 1000 No per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0039 1000 No per square kilometre | 0.0038 1000 No per square kilometre | 0.0039 1000 No per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Suriname
- 182 Canada 0.0045 1000 No per square kilometre compare
- 183 Botswana 0.0044 1000 No per square kilometre compare
- 184 Libya 0.0042 1000 No per square kilometre compare
- 186 Guyana 0.0039 1000 No per square kilometre compare
- 187 Iceland 0.0038 1000 No per square kilometre compare
- 188 Namibia 0.0036 1000 No per square kilometre compare
More work & labour data for Suriname
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -0.3451 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -0.3213 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -0.368 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.2 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 0.4854 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 480.04 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 168.36 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 358.14 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 350.87 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 709 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is population - est. & proj. — total population - both sexes, per square in Suriname?
- Population - est. & proj. — total population - both sexes, per square in Suriname was 0.0039 1000 No per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest population - est. & proj. — total population - both sexes, per square recorded in Suriname?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0039 1000 No per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest population - est. & proj. — total population - both sexes, per square recorded in Suriname?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0017 1000 No per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Suriname rank for population - est. & proj. — total population - both sexes, per square?
- Suriname ranks 185th out of 191 countries with data for 2023.
- Is population - est. & proj. — total population - both sexes, per square rising or falling in Suriname?
- Over the last ten years it is up 10.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Suriname data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.