Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, per square in Chile
Chile: Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, per square was 0.0265 1000 No per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising
Latest (2023)
0.0265 1000 No per square kilometre
Change on year
up 0.5%
World rank
154th
of 191 countries
All-time high
0.0265 1000 No per square kilometre
in 2023
All-time low
0.0112 1000 No per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, per square in Chile, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in 1000 No per square kilometre.
Analysis
Chile recorded 0.0265 1000 No per square kilometre for population - est. & proj. — total population - both sexes, per square in 2023. That is the highest value across all 63 years on record.
That represents a change of up 0.5% on the previous year and up 11.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, population - est. & proj. — total population - both sexes, per square in Chile peaked at 0.0265 1000 No per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 0.0112 1000 No per square kilometre, in 1961.
That places Chile 154th out of 191 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 63 years of available data.
Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, per square in Chile, year by year
| Year | 1000 No per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0112 1000 No per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.0114 1000 No per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 1963 | 0.0117 1000 No per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 1964 | 0.0119 1000 No per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 1965 | 0.0121 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 1966 | 0.0123 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 1967 | 0.0126 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 1968 | 0.0128 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 1969 | 0.013 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 1970 | 0.0132 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 1971 | 0.0135 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 1972 | 0.0137 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 1973 | 0.0139 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 1974 | 0.0141 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 1975 | 0.0144 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 1976 | 0.0146 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 1977 | 0.0148 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 1978 | 0.015 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 1979 | 0.0153 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 1980 | 0.0155 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 1981 | 0.0157 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 1982 | 0.0159 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 1983 | 0.0162 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 1984 | 0.0164 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 1985 | 0.0167 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 1986 | 0.0169 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 1987 | 0.0172 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 1988 | 0.0175 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 1989 | 0.0178 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 1990 | 0.0181 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 1991 | 0.0184 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 1992 | 0.0187 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 1993 | 0.019 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 1994 | 0.0193 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 1995 | 0.0195 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 1996 | 0.0198 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 1997 | 0.0201 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.3% |
| 1998 | 0.0203 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.3% |
| 1999 | 0.0206 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.3% |
| 2000 | 0.0209 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.2% |
| 2001 | 0.0211 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.2% |
| 2002 | 0.0213 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 2003 | 0.0216 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 2004 | 0.0218 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 2005 | 0.022 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 2006 | 0.0222 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 2007 | 0.0224 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 2008 | 0.0226 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 2009 | 0.0229 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 2010 | 0.0231 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 2011 | 0.0233 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 2012 | 0.0236 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 2013 | 0.0238 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 2014 | 0.0241 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.3% |
| 2015 | 0.0243 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 2016 | 0.0246 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 2017 | 0.025 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 2018 | 0.0255 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 2019 | 0.0258 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 2020 | 0.0261 1000 No per square kilometre | +0.9% |
| 2021 | 0.0262 1000 No per square kilometre | +0.4% |
| 2022 | 0.0263 1000 No per square kilometre | +0.5% |
| 2023 | 0.0265 1000 No per square kilometre | +0.5% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0121 1000 No per square kilometre | 0.0112 1000 No per square kilometre | 0.013 1000 No per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.0142 1000 No per square kilometre | 0.0132 1000 No per square kilometre | 0.0153 1000 No per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.0166 1000 No per square kilometre | 0.0155 1000 No per square kilometre | 0.0178 1000 No per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.0194 1000 No per square kilometre | 0.0181 1000 No per square kilometre | 0.0206 1000 No per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.0219 1000 No per square kilometre | 0.0209 1000 No per square kilometre | 0.0229 1000 No per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0243 1000 No per square kilometre | 0.0231 1000 No per square kilometre | 0.0258 1000 No per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0263 1000 No per square kilometre | 0.0261 1000 No per square kilometre | 0.0265 1000 No per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Chile
- 151 Solomon Islands 0.0286 1000 No per square kilometre compare
- 152 Zambia 0.0279 1000 No per square kilometre compare
- 153 Sudan 0.0268 1000 No per square kilometre compare
- 155 Peru 0.0264 1000 No per square kilometre compare
- 156 Vanuatu 0.0263 1000 No per square kilometre compare
- 157 Sweden 0.0259 1000 No per square kilometre compare
More work & labour data for Chile
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -1.14 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -1.14 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -1.15 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.62 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 0.2334 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 19,028 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 1,690 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 6,735 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 6,695 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 13,431 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is population - est. & proj. — total population - both sexes, per square in Chile?
- Population - est. & proj. — total population - both sexes, per square in Chile was 0.0265 1000 No per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest population - est. & proj. — total population - both sexes, per square recorded in Chile?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0265 1000 No per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest population - est. & proj. — total population - both sexes, per square recorded in Chile?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0112 1000 No per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Chile rank for population - est. & proj. — total population - both sexes, per square?
- Chile ranks 154th out of 191 countries with data for 2023.
- Is population - est. & proj. — total population - both sexes, per square rising or falling in Chile?
- Over the last ten years it is up 11.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Chile data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.