Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, per unit of GDP in Trinidad and Tobago
Trinidad and Tobago: Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, per unit of GDP was 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, per unit of GDP in Trinidad and Tobago, 1960–2025
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in 1000 No per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
The most recent figure for population - est. & proj. — rural population, per unit of gdp in Trinidad and Tobago is 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP, measured in 2025.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 1.5% on the previous year and up 4.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, population - est. & proj. — rural population, per unit of gdp in Trinidad and Tobago peaked at 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP in 1960 and was at its lowest, 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP, in 2014.
That places Trinidad and Tobago 105th out of 187 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, per unit of GDP in Trinidad and Tobago, year by year
| Year | 1000 No per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1960 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1961 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -7.8% |
| 1962 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -5.2% |
| 1963 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -8.6% |
| 1964 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -4.9% |
| 1965 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -3.8% |
| 1966 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | +1.1% |
| 1967 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -5.8% |
| 1968 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -0.5% |
| 1969 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -3.5% |
| 1970 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -5.9% |
| 1971 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -8.9% |
| 1972 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -17.5% |
| 1973 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -17.5% |
| 1974 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -36.1% |
| 1975 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -16.7% |
| 1976 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -2.7% |
| 1977 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -20.7% |
| 1978 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -12.3% |
| 1979 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -23.0% |
| 1980 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -26.4% |
| 1981 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -9.7% |
| 1982 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -13.0% |
| 1983 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | +6.1% |
| 1984 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | +1.2% |
| 1985 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | +6.1% |
| 1986 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | +55.0% |
| 1987 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | +0.5% |
| 1988 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | +7.1% |
| 1989 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | +4.4% |
| 1990 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -14.5% |
| 1991 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -4.3% |
| 1992 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -2.2% |
| 1993 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | +16.7% |
| 1994 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -5.5% |
| 1995 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -7.2% |
| 1996 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -7.6% |
| 1997 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | +0.2% |
| 1998 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -5.3% |
| 1999 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -11.4% |
| 2000 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -16.5% |
| 2001 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -6.9% |
| 2002 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -1.2% |
| 2003 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -19.6% |
| 2004 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -14.1% |
| 2005 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -16.1% |
| 2006 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -12.2% |
| 2007 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -14.4% |
| 2008 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -21.7% |
| 2009 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | +46.7% |
| 2010 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -12.7% |
| 2011 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -12.1% |
| 2012 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -5.5% |
| 2013 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -4.2% |
| 2014 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -2.4% |
| 2015 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | +10.5% |
| 2016 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | +14.2% |
| 2017 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -0.5% |
| 2018 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | +0.1% |
| 2019 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | +1.9% |
| 2020 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | +12.5% |
| 2021 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -13.8% |
| 2022 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -14.6% |
| 2023 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | +13.0% |
| 2024 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -2.6% |
| 2025 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -1.5% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1970s | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1980s | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1990s | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2000s | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 6 |
Countries ranked near Trinidad and Tobago
More work & labour data for Trinidad and Tobago
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -0.9186 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -0.882 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -0.9542 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.53 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 0.2012 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 812.28 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 482.78 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 455.57 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 442.79 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 898.36 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is population - est. & proj. — rural population, per unit of gdp in Trinidad and Tobago?
- Population - est. & proj. — rural population, per unit of gdp in Trinidad and Tobago was 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP in 2025, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest population - est. & proj. — rural population, per unit of gdp recorded in Trinidad and Tobago?
- The highest recorded value was 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP in 1960.
- What is the lowest population - est. & proj. — rural population, per unit of gdp recorded in Trinidad and Tobago?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP in 2014.
- How does Trinidad and Tobago rank for population - est. & proj. — rural population, per unit of gdp?
- Trinidad and Tobago ranks 105th out of 187 countries with data for 2025.
- Is population - est. & proj. — rural population, per unit of gdp rising or falling in Trinidad and Tobago?
- Over the last ten years it is up 4.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Trinidad and Tobago data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 66 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.