Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, per unit of GDP in Latvia
Latvia: Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, per unit of GDP was 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, per unit of GDP in Latvia, 1995–2025
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in 1000 No per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
In 2025, population - est. & proj. — rural population, per unit of gdp in Latvia stood at 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP. That is the lowest value across all 31 years on record.
That represents a change of down 10.7% on the previous year and down 52.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, population - est. & proj. — rural population, per unit of gdp in Latvia peaked at 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP in 1995 and was at its lowest, 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP, in 2025.
Latvia ranks 126th of 187 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, per unit of GDP in Latvia, year by year
| Year | 1000 No per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1995 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1996 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -4.1% |
| 1997 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -9.5% |
| 1998 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -9.4% |
| 1999 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -5.0% |
| 2000 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -6.1% |
| 2001 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -5.9% |
| 2002 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -12.2% |
| 2003 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -18.6% |
| 2004 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -19.9% |
| 2005 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -16.5% |
| 2006 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -21.1% |
| 2007 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -31.2% |
| 2008 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -14.7% |
| 2009 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | +31.3% |
| 2010 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | +8.0% |
| 2011 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -12.9% |
| 2012 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -3.3% |
| 2013 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -8.2% |
| 2014 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -5.0% |
| 2015 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | +13.5% |
| 2016 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -4.1% |
| 2017 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -8.9% |
| 2018 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -12.7% |
| 2019 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -0.8% |
| 2020 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -2.1% |
| 2021 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -13.7% |
| 2022 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -0.8% |
| 2023 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -12.3% |
| 2024 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -4.0% |
| 2025 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -10.7% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 5 |
| 2000s | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 6 |
Countries ranked near Latvia
More work & labour data for Latvia
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -1.02 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -1 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -1.04 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.94 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate -0.2718 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 1,152 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 365.13 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 470.3 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 455.07 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 925.37 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is population - est. & proj. — rural population, per unit of gdp in Latvia?
- Population - est. & proj. — rural population, per unit of gdp in Latvia was 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP in 2025, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest population - est. & proj. — rural population, per unit of gdp recorded in Latvia?
- The highest recorded value was 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP in 1995.
- What is the lowest population - est. & proj. — rural population, per unit of gdp recorded in Latvia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP in 2025.
- How does Latvia rank for population - est. & proj. — rural population, per unit of gdp?
- Latvia ranks 126th out of 187 countries with data for 2025.
- Is population - est. & proj. — rural population, per unit of gdp rising or falling in Latvia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 52.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Latvia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 31 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.