NEET: Youth not in employment, education or training (ILO modelled) in Equatorial Guinea
Equatorial Guinea: NEET: Youth not in employment, education or training (ILO modelled) was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2025. ▲ Rising
NEET: Youth not in employment, education or training (ILO modelled) in Equatorial Guinea, 2005–2025
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
Equatorial Guinea recorded 0 units per US$ of GDP for neet: youth not in employment, education or training (ilo modelled) in 2025.
That represents a change of up 10.6% on the previous year and up 56.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, neet: youth not in employment, education or training (ilo modelled) in Equatorial Guinea peaked at 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2020 and was at its lowest, 0 units per US$ of GDP, in 2012.
That places Equatorial Guinea 80th out of 185 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 21 years of available data.
NEET: Youth not in employment, education or training (ILO modelled) in Equatorial Guinea, year by year
| Year | units per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | — |
| 2006 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -13.9% |
| 2007 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -19.6% |
| 2008 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -31.8% |
| 2009 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +36.6% |
| 2010 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -4.3% |
| 2011 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -23.2% |
| 2012 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -4.8% |
| 2013 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +2.2% |
| 2014 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +1.4% |
| 2015 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +68.7% |
| 2016 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +20.4% |
| 2017 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -5.6% |
| 2018 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -3.7% |
| 2019 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +20.8% |
| 2020 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +24.7% |
| 2021 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -17.3% |
| 2022 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -9.4% |
| 2023 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +14.2% |
| 2024 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +0.4% |
| 2025 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +10.6% |
Equatorial Guinea compared with similar countries
- Equatorial Guinea's 0 units per US$ of GDP is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0 units per US$ of GDP, 1.8× the median. (53 countries reporting)
- Equatorial Guinea's 0 units per US$ of GDP is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 0 units per US$ of GDP, 20% of the median. (47 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 5 |
| 2010s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 6 |
Countries ranked near Equatorial Guinea
More work & labour data for Equatorial Guinea
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual 0.4453 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth 0.4489 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth 0.4415 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate 0.3895 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 2.07 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 2,356 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 489.2 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 2,448 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 2,556 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 5,003 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is neet: youth not in employment, education or training (ilo modelled) in Equatorial Guinea?
- Neet: youth not in employment, education or training (ilo modelled) in Equatorial Guinea was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2025, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest neet: youth not in employment, education or training (ilo modelled) recorded in Equatorial Guinea?
- The highest recorded value was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2020.
- What is the lowest neet: youth not in employment, education or training (ilo modelled) recorded in Equatorial Guinea?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2012.
- How does Equatorial Guinea rank for neet: youth not in employment, education or training (ilo modelled)?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 80th out of 185 countries with data for 2025.
- Is neet: youth not in employment, education or training (ilo modelled) rising or falling in Equatorial Guinea?
- Over the last ten years it is up 56.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Equatorial Guinea data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of NEET: Youth not in employment, education or training (ILO modelled estimates), per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
NEET: Youth not in employment, education or training (ILO modelled estimates) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
NEET: Youth not in employment, education or training (ILO modelled estimates) ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- NEET: Youth not in employment, education or training International Labour Organization
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
NEET: Youth not in employment, education or training (ILO modelled estimates) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.