Share of workers in informal employment: men vs. women in Latvia
Latvia: Share of workers in informal employment: men vs. women was 1.6% in 2024. ▼ Falling
Share of workers in informal employment: men vs. women in Latvia, 2007–2024
Source: International Labour Organization – with minor processing by Our World in Data. Measured in %.
Analysis
The most recent figure for share of workers in informal employment: men vs. women in Latvia is 1.6%, measured in 2024.
That represents a change of down 22.7% on the previous year and down 51.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, share of workers in informal employment: men vs. women in Latvia peaked at 5.6% in 2011 and was at its lowest, 1.4%, in 2022.
Latvia ranks 70th of 82 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 18 years of available data.
Share of workers in informal employment: men vs. women in Latvia, year by year
| Year | % | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 4.3% | — |
| 2008 | 2.8% | -35.0% |
| 2009 | 3.8% | +34.2% |
| 2010 | 5.5% | +45.1% |
| 2011 | 5.6% | +2.4% |
| 2012 | 2.8% | -50.0% |
| 2013 | 4.0% | +41.4% |
| 2014 | 3.4% | -15.2% |
| 2015 | 3.3% | -1.2% |
| 2016 | 3.1% | -6.0% |
| 2017 | 2.0% | -34.6% |
| 2018 | 2.2% | +6.9% |
| 2019 | 2.0% | -7.8% |
| 2020 | 2.2% | +11.4% |
| 2021 | 2.6% | +17.4% |
| 2022 | 1.4% | -46.4% |
| 2023 | 2.1% | +49.6% |
| 2024 | 1.6% | -22.7% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.6% | 2.8% | 4.3% | 3 |
| 2010s | 3.4% | 2.0% | 5.6% | 10 |
| 2020s | 2.0% | 1.4% | 2.6% | 5 |
Countries ranked near Latvia
More work & labour data for Latvia
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -1.02 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -1 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -1.04 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.94 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate -0.2718 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 1,152 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 365.13 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 470.3 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 455.07 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 925.37 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is share of workers in informal employment: men vs. women in Latvia?
- Share of workers in informal employment: men vs. women in Latvia was 1.6% in 2024, according to International Labour Organization – with minor processing by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest share of workers in informal employment: men vs. women recorded in Latvia?
- The highest recorded value was 5.6% in 2011.
- What is the lowest share of workers in informal employment: men vs. women recorded in Latvia?
- The lowest recorded value was 1.4% in 2022.
- How does Latvia rank for share of workers in informal employment: men vs. women?
- Latvia ranks 70th out of 82 countries with data for 2024.
- Is share of workers in informal employment: men vs. women rising or falling in Latvia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 51.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Latvia data come from?
- The figures come from International Labour Organization – with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as part of Share of workers in informal employment: men vs. women. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 18 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Share of employed males working in jobs that lack basic social or legal protection and employment benefits. Does not include illegal and illicit activities. Figures refer to national estimates and may not be fully comparable across countries.