LU4: Composite rate of labour underutilization (previous ILO) in Lithuania

Lithuania: LU4: Composite rate of labour underutilization (previous ILO) was 10.41 in 2024. ▼ Falling

Latest (2024)
10.41
Change on year
up 1.3%
World rank
49th
of 75 countries
All-time high
24.24
in 2001
All-time low
8.37
in 2019
Years of data
24
2001–2024

LU4: Composite rate of labour underutilization (previous ILO) in Lithuania, 2001–2024

101520252001201220242001: 24.22002: 20.82003: 19.12004: 16.62005: 13.32006: 10.42007: 8.62008: 10.82009: 18.92010: 22.52011: 19.72012: 17.62013: 15.92014: 14.42015: 12.22016: 10.92017: 102018: 8.52019: 8.42020: 112021: 10.72022: 9.42023: 10.32024: 10.4

Source: International Labour Organization.

Analysis

The most recent figure for lu4: composite rate of labour underutilization (previous ilo) in Lithuania is 10.41, measured in 2024.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 1.3% on the previous year and down 27.8% over ten years.

Over the whole period, lu4: composite rate of labour underutilization (previous ilo) in Lithuania peaked at 24.24 in 2001 and was at its lowest, 8.37, in 2019.

That places Lithuania 49th out of 75 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 24 years of available data.

LU4: Composite rate of labour underutilization (previous ILO) in Lithuania, year by year

Annual values for LU4: Composite rate of labour underutilization (previous ILO definition - ICLS13) (15+) in Lithuania, 2001 to 2024.
Year Value Change
2001 24.24
2002 20.76 -14.4%
2003 19.11 -7.9%
2004 16.55 -13.4%
2005 13.28 -19.8%
2006 10.38 -21.8%
2007 8.62 -17.0%
2008 10.79 +25.1%
2009 18.89 +75.1%
2010 22.49 +19.0%
2011 19.68 -12.5%
2012 17.56 -10.8%
2013 15.91 -9.4%
2014 14.43 -9.3%
2015 12.18 -15.6%
2016 10.93 -10.2%
2017 9.96 -8.9%
2018 8.55 -14.2%
2019 8.37 -2.1%
2020 11.04 +31.9%
2021 10.74 -2.7%
2022 9.36 -12.8%
2023 10.28 +9.8%
2024 10.41 +1.3%

Lithuania compared with similar countries

  • Lithuania's 10.41 is below the median for high income countries, which is 11.43, 91% of the median. (42 countries reporting)
  • Lithuania's 10.41 is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 12.04, 86% of the median. (39 countries reporting)

Biggest year-on-year movements

Years where LU4: Composite rate of labour underutilization (previous ILO) in Lithuania changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.

YearChange FromTo
2009 +75.1% 10.79 18.89

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 15.85 8.62 24.24 9
2010s 14 8.37 22.49 10
2020s 10.37 9.36 11.04 5

Countries ranked near Lithuania

  1. 46 Dominican Republic 10.71 compare
  2. 47 Cyprus 10.59 compare
  3. 48 Norway 10.51 compare
  4. 50 Brunei 10.32 compare
  5. 51 Iceland 10.23 compare
  6. 52 Mauritius 9.6 compare

See the full ranking of 75 places →

More work & labour data for Lithuania

All data for Lithuania →

Frequently asked questions

What is lu4: composite rate of labour underutilization (previous ilo) in Lithuania?
Lu4: composite rate of labour underutilization (previous ilo) in Lithuania was 10.41 in 2024, according to International Labour Organization.
What is the highest lu4: composite rate of labour underutilization (previous ilo) recorded in Lithuania?
The highest recorded value was 24.24 in 2001.
What is the lowest lu4: composite rate of labour underutilization (previous ilo) recorded in Lithuania?
The lowest recorded value was 8.37 in 2019.
How does Lithuania rank for lu4: composite rate of labour underutilization (previous ilo)?
Lithuania ranks 49th out of 75 countries with data for 2024.
Is lu4: composite rate of labour underutilization (previous ilo) rising or falling in Lithuania?
Over the last ten years it is down 27.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Lithuania data come from?
The figures come from International Labour Organization, published as part of LU4: Composite rate of labour underutilization (previous ILO definition - ICLS13) (15+). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 24 observations, free to reuse under ILO Terms of Use (attribution required).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

LU4: Composite rate of labour underutilization (previous ILO) in Lithuania. Statizoid, drawing on International Labour Organization. Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/lu4-composite-rate-of-labour-underutilization-previous-ilo-definition-icls13-15/lithuania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under ILO Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/lu4-composite-rate-of-labour-underutilization-previous-ilo-definition-icls13-15/lithuania/">LU4: Composite rate of labour underutilization (previous ILO) in Lithuania</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
LU4: Composite rate of labour underutilization (previous ILO definition - ICLS13) (15+)
Source
International Labour Organization
Licence
ILO Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
75 places, 1,249 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

With the aim of promoting international comparability, statistics presented on ILOSTAT are based on standard international definitions wherever feasible and may differ from official national figures. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. For time series comparability, it includes countries that have implemented the 19th ICLS standards, for which data are also available in the Work Statistics -- 19th ICLS (WORK) database. LU4 represents the share of the extended labour force that are in unemployment, time-related underemployment or the potential labour force. Data disaggregated by level of education are provided on the highest level of education completed, classified according to the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED). Data may have been regrouped from national classifications, which may not be strictly compatible with ISCED. For more information, refer to the Education and Mismatch Indicators (EMI) database description.