Labour income distribution (ILO modelled estimates) (Decile 1), per in New Zealand
New Zealand: Labour income distribution (ILO modelled estimates) (Decile 1), per was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2025. ▼ Falling
Labour income distribution (ILO modelled estimates) (Decile 1), per in New Zealand, 2004–2025
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
In 2025, labour income distribution (ilo modelled estimates) (decile 1), per in New Zealand stood at 0 units per US$ of GDP. That is the lowest value across all 22 years on record.
That represents a change of down 0.7% on the previous year and down 31.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, labour income distribution (ilo modelled estimates) (decile 1), per in New Zealand peaked at 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2004 and was at its lowest, 0 units per US$ of GDP, in 2025.
That places New Zealand 128th out of 185 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 22 years of available data.
Labour income distribution (ILO modelled estimates) (Decile 1), per in New Zealand, year by year
| Year | units per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2004 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | — |
| 2005 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -9.1% |
| 2006 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +3.1% |
| 2007 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -18.5% |
| 2008 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +3.0% |
| 2009 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +9.9% |
| 2010 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -17.0% |
| 2011 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -12.7% |
| 2012 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -4.4% |
| 2013 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -7.4% |
| 2014 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -5.0% |
| 2015 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +13.3% |
| 2016 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -5.5% |
| 2017 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -8.4% |
| 2018 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -2.2% |
| 2019 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -0.5% |
| 2020 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +3.8% |
| 2021 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -6.8% |
| 2022 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -11.3% |
| 2023 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -2.4% |
| 2024 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -1.7% |
| 2025 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -0.7% |
New Zealand compared with similar countries
- New Zealand's 0 units per US$ of GDP is below the median for high income countries, which is 0 units per US$ of GDP, 58% of the median. (62 countries reporting)
- New Zealand's 0 units per US$ of GDP is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 0 units per US$ of GDP, 17% of the median. (28 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 6 |
| 2010s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 6 |
Countries ranked near New Zealand
More work & labour data for New Zealand
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -0.0748 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -0.0721 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -0.0776 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.39 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 0.4877 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 5,200 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 511.04 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 2,819 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 2,994 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 5,812 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is labour income distribution (ilo modelled estimates) (decile 1), per in New Zealand?
- Labour income distribution (ilo modelled estimates) (decile 1), per in New Zealand was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2025, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest labour income distribution (ilo modelled estimates) (decile 1), per recorded in New Zealand?
- The highest recorded value was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2004.
- What is the lowest labour income distribution (ilo modelled estimates) (decile 1), per recorded in New Zealand?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2025.
- How does New Zealand rank for labour income distribution (ilo modelled estimates) (decile 1), per?
- New Zealand ranks 128th out of 185 countries with data for 2025.
- Is labour income distribution (ilo modelled estimates) (decile 1), per rising or falling in New Zealand?
- Over the last ten years it is down 31.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this New Zealand data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Labour income distribution (ILO modelled estimates) (Decile 1), per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 22 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Labour income distribution (ILO modelled estimates) (Decile 1) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Labour income distribution (ILO modelled estimates) (Decile 1) ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Labour income distribution (ILO modelled estimates) International Labour Organization
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Labour income distribution (ILO modelled estimates) (Decile 1) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.