Labor market, S1 - Procedural inconvenience in Pakistan

Pakistan: Labor market, S1 - Procedural inconvenience was 0.9051 in 2014. β–¬ Flat

Latest (2014)
0.9051
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
28th
of 90 countries
All-time high
0.9051
in 1973
All-time low
0.9051
in 1973
Years of data
42
1973–2014

Labor market, S1 - Procedural inconvenience in Pakistan, 1973–2014

00.20.40.60.811973199320141973: 0.9051974: 0.9051975: 0.9051976: 0.9051977: 0.9051978: 0.9051979: 0.9051980: 0.9051981: 0.9051982: 0.9051983: 0.9051984: 0.9051985: 0.9051986: 0.9051987: 0.9051988: 0.9051989: 0.9051990: 0.9051991: 0.9051992: 0.9051993: 0.9051994: 0.9051995: 0.9051996: 0.9051997: 0.9051998: 0.9051999: 0.9052000: 0.9052001: 0.9052002: 0.9052003: 0.9052004: 0.9052005: 0.9052006: 0.9052007: 0.9052008: 0.9052009: 0.9052010: 0.9052011: 0.9052012: 0.9052013: 0.9052014: 0.905

Source: International Monetary Fund.

Analysis

The most recent figure for labor market, s1 - procedural inconvenience in Pakistan is 0.9051, measured in 2014. That is the highest value across all 42 years on record.

That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, labor market, s1 - procedural inconvenience in Pakistan peaked at 0.9051 in 1973 and was at its lowest, 0.9051, in 1973.

That places Pakistan 28th out of 90 countries with data for 2014, putting it in the middle of the range.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1970s 0.9051 0.9051 0.9051 7
1980s 0.9051 0.9051 0.9051 10
1990s 0.9051 0.9051 0.9051 10
2000s 0.9051 0.9051 0.9051 10
2010s 0.9051 0.9051 0.9051 5

Countries ranked near Pakistan

  1. 25 Switzerland 0.95 compare
  2. 26 Philippines 0.9333 compare
  3. 27 Latvia 0.9111 compare
  4. 29 China 0.9009 compare
  5. 30 El Salvador 0.9 compare
  6. 31 Nicaragua 0.8923 compare

See the full ranking of 90 places β†’

More work & labour data for Pakistan

All data for Pakistan β†’

Frequently asked questions

What is labor market, s1 - procedural inconvenience in Pakistan?
Labor market, s1 - procedural inconvenience in Pakistan was 0.9051 in 2014, according to International Monetary Fund.
What is the highest labor market, s1 - procedural inconvenience recorded in Pakistan?
The highest recorded value was 0.9051 in 1973.
What is the lowest labor market, s1 - procedural inconvenience recorded in Pakistan?
The lowest recorded value was 0.9051 in 1973.
How does Pakistan rank for labor market, s1 - procedural inconvenience?
Pakistan ranks 28th out of 90 countries with data for 2014.
Is labor market, s1 - procedural inconvenience rising or falling in Pakistan?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Pakistan data come from?
The figures come from International Monetary Fund, published as part of Labor market, S1 - Procedural inconvenience. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV Β· JSON β€” 42 observations, free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Labor market, S1 - Procedural inconvenience in Pakistan. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/labor-market-s1-procedural-inconvenience/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/labor-market-s1-procedural-inconvenience/pakistan/">Labor market, S1 - Procedural inconvenience in Pakistan</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Labor market, S1 - Procedural inconvenience
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
90 places, 3,515 data points, 1973–2014
Last refreshed

The SRD contains data on a wide range of structural policies across different countries. These policies are things that affect how markets function, like labor laws, regulations on businesses, and trade policies.