Labor market, S1 - Procedural inconvenience in Norway

Norway: Labor market, S1 - Procedural inconvenience was 0.5249 in 2014. β–Ό Falling

Latest (2014)
0.5249
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
80th
of 90 countries
All-time high
0.9649
in 1973
All-time low
0.5249
in 1995
Years of data
42
1973–2014

Labor market, S1 - Procedural inconvenience in Norway, 1973–2014

00.20.40.60.811973199320141973: 0.9651974: 0.9651975: 0.9651976: 0.9651977: 0.9651978: 0.9561979: 0.9561980: 0.9561981: 0.9561982: 0.9561983: 0.9561984: 0.9561985: 0.9561986: 0.9561987: 0.9561988: 0.9561989: 0.9561990: 0.9561991: 0.9561992: 0.9561993: 0.9561994: 0.9561995: 0.5251996: 0.5251997: 0.5251998: 0.5251999: 0.5252000: 0.5252001: 0.5252002: 0.5252003: 0.5252004: 0.5252005: 0.5252006: 0.5252007: 0.5252008: 0.5252009: 0.5252010: 0.5252011: 0.5252012: 0.5252013: 0.5252014: 0.525

Source: International Monetary Fund.

Analysis

Norway recorded 0.5249 for labor market, s1 - procedural inconvenience in 2014. That is the lowest value across all 42 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, labor market, s1 - procedural inconvenience in Norway peaked at 0.9649 in 1973 and was at its lowest, 0.5249, in 1995.

Norway ranks 80th of 90 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 42 years of available data.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1970s 0.9622 0.9556 0.9649 7
1980s 0.9556 0.9556 0.9556 10
1990s 0.7402 0.5249 0.9556 10
2000s 0.5249 0.5249 0.5249 10
2010s 0.5249 0.5249 0.5249 5

Countries ranked near Norway

  1. 77 Czechia 0.5453 compare
  2. 78 Sweden 0.5276 compare
  3. 79 Uzbekistan 0.5262 compare
  4. 81 Viet Nam 0.5111 compare
  5. 82 Morocco 0.4723 compare
  6. 83 Portugal 0.4668 compare

See the full ranking of 90 places β†’

More work & labour data for Norway

All data for Norway β†’

Frequently asked questions

What is labor market, s1 - procedural inconvenience in Norway?
Labor market, s1 - procedural inconvenience in Norway was 0.5249 in 2014, according to International Monetary Fund.
What is the highest labor market, s1 - procedural inconvenience recorded in Norway?
The highest recorded value was 0.9649 in 1973.
What is the lowest labor market, s1 - procedural inconvenience recorded in Norway?
The lowest recorded value was 0.5249 in 1995.
How does Norway rank for labor market, s1 - procedural inconvenience?
Norway ranks 80th out of 90 countries with data for 2014.
Is labor market, s1 - procedural inconvenience rising or falling in Norway?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Norway data come from?
The figures come from International Monetary Fund, published as part of Labor market, S1 - Procedural inconvenience. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV Β· JSON β€” 42 observations, free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Labor market, S1 - Procedural inconvenience in Norway. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/labor-market-s1-procedural-inconvenience/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/labor-market-s1-procedural-inconvenience/norway/">Labor market, S1 - Procedural inconvenience in Norway</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Labor market, S1 - Procedural inconvenience
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
90 places, 3,515 data points, 1973–2014
Last refreshed

The SRD contains data on a wide range of structural policies across different countries. These policies are things that affect how markets function, like labor laws, regulations on businesses, and trade policies.