Labor market, S1 - Procedural inconvenience in Georgia

Georgia: Labor market, S1 - Procedural inconvenience was 1 in 2014. β–² Rising

Latest (2014)
1
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
1st
of 90 countries
All-time high
1
in 2007
All-time low
0.6684
in 1991
Years of data
24
1991–2014

Labor market, S1 - Procedural inconvenience in Georgia, 1991–2014

00.20.40.60.811991200220141991: 0.6681992: 0.6681993: 0.6681994: 0.6681995: 0.6681996: 0.6681997: 0.6681998: 0.7131999: 0.7132000: 0.7132001: 0.7132002: 0.7132003: 0.7132004: 0.7132005: 0.7132006: 0.7132007: 12008: 12009: 12010: 12011: 12012: 12013: 12014: 1

Source: International Monetary Fund.

Analysis

The most recent figure for labor market, s1 - procedural inconvenience in Georgia is 1, measured in 2014. That is the highest value across all 24 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 40.3% over ten years.

Over the whole period, labor market, s1 - procedural inconvenience in Georgia peaked at 1 in 2007 and was at its lowest, 0.6684, in 1991.

Georgia ranks 1st of 90 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 24 years of available data.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 0.6783 0.6684 0.7129 9
2000s 0.799 0.7129 1 10
2010s 1 1 1 5

Countries ranked near Georgia

  1. 1 Canada 1 compare
  2. 1 Colombia 1 compare
  3. 1 Costa Rica 1 compare
  4. 1 Estonia 1 compare
  5. 1 Ethiopia 1 compare
  6. 1 Guatemala 1 compare
  7. 1 Hong Kong, China 1 compare
  8. 1 Hungary 1 compare
  9. 1 Ireland 1 compare
  10. 1 Israel 1 compare
  11. 1 Jamaica 1 compare
  12. 1 Japan 1 compare
  13. 1 Lithuania 1 compare
  14. 1 Malaysia 1 compare
  15. 1 Paraguay 1 compare
  16. 1 Singapore 1 compare
  17. 1 Uruguay 1 compare
  18. 1 United States of America 1 compare

See the full ranking of 90 places β†’

More work & labour data for Georgia

All data for Georgia β†’

Frequently asked questions

What is labor market, s1 - procedural inconvenience in Georgia?
Labor market, s1 - procedural inconvenience in Georgia was 1 in 2014, according to International Monetary Fund.
What is the highest labor market, s1 - procedural inconvenience recorded in Georgia?
The highest recorded value was 1 in 2007.
What is the lowest labor market, s1 - procedural inconvenience recorded in Georgia?
The lowest recorded value was 0.6684 in 1991.
How does Georgia rank for labor market, s1 - procedural inconvenience?
Georgia ranks 1st out of 90 countries with data for 2014.
Is labor market, s1 - procedural inconvenience rising or falling in Georgia?
Over the last ten years it is up 40.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Georgia data come from?
The figures come from International Monetary Fund, published as part of Labor market, S1 - Procedural inconvenience. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV Β· JSON β€” 24 observations, free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Labor market, S1 - Procedural inconvenience in Georgia. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/labor-market-s1-procedural-inconvenience/georgia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/labor-market-s1-procedural-inconvenience/georgia/">Labor market, S1 - Procedural inconvenience in Georgia</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Labor market, S1 - Procedural inconvenience
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
90 places, 3,515 data points, 1973–2014
Last refreshed

The SRD contains data on a wide range of structural policies across different countries. These policies are things that affect how markets function, like labor laws, regulations on businesses, and trade policies.