Labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs … annual in Pakistan
Pakistan: Labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs … annual was 92.06 % change on previous year in 2021. ◆ Volatile
Labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980 in Pakistan, 1977–2021
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
The most recent figure for labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980 in Pakistan is 92.06 % change on previous year, measured in 2021.
That represents a change of up 315.5% on the previous year and up 97,323.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980 in Pakistan peaked at 106.92 % change on previous year in 1981 and was at its lowest, -42.72 % change on previous year, in 2020.
That places Pakistan 1st out of 116 countries with data for 2021, putting it in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs … annual in Pakistan, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1977 | -0.0675 % change on previous year | — |
| 1978 | 2.62 % change on previous year | -3977.6% |
| 1979 | -0.3128 % change on previous year | -111.9% |
| 1980 | -0.4458 % change on previous year | +42.6% |
| 1981 | 106.92 % change on previous year | -24081.1% |
| 1982 | -0.7615 % change on previous year | -100.7% |
| 1983 | -8.78 % change on previous year | +1053.0% |
| 1984 | -0.6907 % change on previous year | -92.1% |
| 1985 | -23.42 % change on previous year | +3291.4% |
| 1986 | 0.3377 % change on previous year | -101.4% |
| 1989 | -0.8391 % change on previous year | -348.5% |
| 1990 | 0.7692 % change on previous year | -191.7% |
| 1991 | 29.28 % change on previous year | +3707.0% |
| 1992 | 0.0886 % change on previous year | -99.7% |
| 1993 | -4.62 % change on previous year | -5312.1% |
| 1994 | 0.0928 % change on previous year | -102.0% |
| 1995 | -18.24 % change on previous year | -19756.8% |
| 1998 | 2 % change on previous year | -111.0% |
| 2005 | -11.75 % change on previous year | -688.4% |
| 2006 | 19.21 % change on previous year | -263.4% |
| 2007 | -0.2127 % change on previous year | -101.1% |
| 2008 | 2.79 % change on previous year | -1413.9% |
| 2009 | 6.08 % change on previous year | +117.6% |
| 2010 | 3.43 % change on previous year | -43.7% |
| 2011 | 0.0945 % change on previous year | -97.2% |
| 2012 | -9.21 % change on previous year | -9851.9% |
| 2013 | 12.65 % change on previous year | -237.3% |
| 2014 | 2.39 % change on previous year | -81.1% |
| 2015 | 3.4 % change on previous year | +42.3% |
| 2016 | -10.9 % change on previous year | -420.6% |
| 2019 | 9.15 % change on previous year | -183.9% |
| 2020 | -42.72 % change on previous year | -566.8% |
| 2021 | 92.06 % change on previous year | -315.5% |
Pakistan compared with similar countries
- Pakistan's 92.06 % change on previous year is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is -2.87 % change on previous year. (18 countries reporting)
- Pakistan's 92.06 % change on previous year is above the median for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, which is 4.52 % change on previous year, 20.4× the median. (14 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs … annual in Pakistan changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1981 | +24081.1% | -0.4458 % change on previous year | 106.92 % change on previous year |
| 1995 | -19756.8% | 0.0928 % change on previous year | -18.24 % change on previous year |
| 2012 | -9851.9% | 0.0945 % change on previous year | -9.21 % change on previous year |
| 1993 | -5312.1% | 0.0886 % change on previous year | -4.62 % change on previous year |
| 1978 | +3977.6% | -0.0675 % change on previous year | 2.62 % change on previous year |
| 1991 | +3707.0% | 0.7692 % change on previous year | 29.28 % change on previous year |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.746 % change on previous year | -0.3128 % change on previous year | 2.62 % change on previous year | 3 |
| 1980s | 9.04 % change on previous year | -23.42 % change on previous year | 106.92 % change on previous year | 8 |
| 1990s | 1.34 % change on previous year | -18.24 % change on previous year | 29.28 % change on previous year | 7 |
| 2000s | 3.22 % change on previous year | -11.75 % change on previous year | 19.21 % change on previous year | 5 |
| 2010s | 1.37 % change on previous year | -10.9 % change on previous year | 12.65 % change on previous year | 8 |
| 2020s | 24.67 % change on previous year | -42.72 % change on previous year | 92.06 % change on previous year | 2 |
Countries ranked near Pakistan
More work & labour data for Pakistan
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual 0.1692 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth 0.1658 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth 0.1724 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -0.4553 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 2.11 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 160,228 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 146,712 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 259,090 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 251,911 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 511,001 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980 in Pakistan?
- Labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980 in Pakistan was 92.06 % change on previous year in 2021, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980 recorded in Pakistan?
- The highest recorded value was 106.92 % change on previous year in 1981.
- What is the lowest labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980 recorded in Pakistan?
- The lowest recorded value was -42.72 % change on previous year in 2020.
- How does Pakistan rank for labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980?
- Pakistan ranks 1st out of 116 countries with data for 2021.
- Is labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980 rising or falling in Pakistan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 97,323.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Pakistan data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980, annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 33 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980 Our World in Data
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.