Incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national in Sweden

Sweden: Incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national was 77.74 Percentage of population in the same subgroup in 2025. ▬ Flat

Latest (2025)
77.74 Percentage of population in the same subgroup
Change on year
down 0.1%
World rank
26th
of 40 countries
All-time high
79.8 Percentage of population in the same subgroup
in 1976
All-time low
74.83 Percentage of population in the same subgroup
in 1987
Years of data
50
1976–2025

Incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national in Sweden, 1976–2025

020406080197620002025

Source: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Measured in Percentage of population in the same subgroup.

Analysis

The most recent figure for incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national in Sweden is 77.74 Percentage of population in the same subgroup, measured in 2025.

That represents a change of down 0.1% on the previous year and up 0.7% over ten years.

Over the whole period, incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national in Sweden peaked at 79.8 Percentage of population in the same subgroup in 1976 and was at its lowest, 74.83 Percentage of population in the same subgroup, in 1987.

Sweden ranks 26th of 40 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national in Sweden, year by year

Annual values for Incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national definitions in Sweden, 1976 to 2025.
Year Percentage of population in the same subgroup Change
1976 79.8 Percentage of population in the same subgroup
1977 78.42 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -1.7%
1978 77.26 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -1.5%
1979 76.36 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -1.2%
1980 75.81 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.7%
1981 75.31 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.7%
1982 75 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.4%
1983 75.18 Percentage of population in the same subgroup +0.2%
1984 75.43 Percentage of population in the same subgroup +0.3%
1985 75.99 Percentage of population in the same subgroup +0.7%
1986 76.49 Percentage of population in the same subgroup +0.6%
1987 74.83 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -2.2%
1988 75.58 Percentage of population in the same subgroup +1.0%
1989 76.25 Percentage of population in the same subgroup +0.9%
1990 76.75 Percentage of population in the same subgroup +0.7%
1991 76.53 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.3%
1992 75.86 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.9%
1993 75.1 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -1.0%
1994 75.08 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.0%
1995 75.69 Percentage of population in the same subgroup +0.8%
1996 76.44 Percentage of population in the same subgroup +1.0%
1997 76.91 Percentage of population in the same subgroup +0.6%
1998 77.48 Percentage of population in the same subgroup +0.8%
1999 77.95 Percentage of population in the same subgroup +0.6%
2000 78.45 Percentage of population in the same subgroup +0.6%
2001 78.66 Percentage of population in the same subgroup +0.3%
2002 78.49 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.2%
2003 78.23 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.3%
2004 77.59 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.8%
2005 76.82 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -1.0%
2006 77 Percentage of population in the same subgroup +0.2%
2007 76.19 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -1.1%
2008 76.37 Percentage of population in the same subgroup +0.2%
2009 75.81 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.7%
2010 75.97 Percentage of population in the same subgroup +0.2%
2011 76.53 Percentage of population in the same subgroup +0.7%
2012 76.69 Percentage of population in the same subgroup +0.2%
2013 76.97 Percentage of population in the same subgroup +0.4%
2014 77.2 Percentage of population in the same subgroup +0.3%
2015 77.17 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.0%
2016 77.71 Percentage of population in the same subgroup +0.7%
2017 77.87 Percentage of population in the same subgroup +0.2%
2018 78.4 Percentage of population in the same subgroup +0.7%
2019 78.47 Percentage of population in the same subgroup +0.1%
2020 78.15 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.4%
2021 76.87 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -1.6%
2022 77.14 Percentage of population in the same subgroup +0.4%
2023 77.44 Percentage of population in the same subgroup +0.4%
2024 77.78 Percentage of population in the same subgroup +0.4%
2025 77.74 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.1%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1970s 77.96 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 76.36 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 79.8 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 4
1980s 75.59 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 74.83 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 76.49 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 10
1990s 76.38 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 75.08 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 77.95 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 10
2000s 77.36 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 75.81 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 78.66 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 10
2010s 77.3 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 75.97 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 78.47 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 10
2020s 77.52 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 76.87 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 78.15 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 6

Countries ranked near Sweden

  1. 23 New Zealand 79.67 Percentage of population in the same subgroup compare
  2. 24 OECD 79.66 Percentage of population in the same subgroup compare
  3. 25 Israel 78.33 Percentage of population in the same subgroup compare
  4. 27 Iceland 76.94 Percentage of population in the same subgroup compare
  5. 28 Mexico 76.71 Percentage of population in the same subgroup compare
  6. 29 Peru 75.29 Percentage of population in the same subgroup compare

See the full ranking of 53 places →

More work & labour data for Sweden

All data for Sweden →

Frequently asked questions

What is incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national in Sweden?
Incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national in Sweden was 77.74 Percentage of population in the same subgroup in 2025, according to Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
What is the highest incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national recorded in Sweden?
The highest recorded value was 79.8 Percentage of population in the same subgroup in 1976.
What is the lowest incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national recorded in Sweden?
The lowest recorded value was 74.83 Percentage of population in the same subgroup in 1987.
How does Sweden rank for incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national?
Sweden ranks 26th out of 40 countries with data for 2025.
Is incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national rising or falling in Sweden?
Over the last ten years it is up 0.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Sweden data come from?
The figures come from Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as part of Incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national definitions. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 50 observations, free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national in Sweden. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/incidence-of-full-time-and-part-time-employment-based-on-national-definitions/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/incidence-of-full-time-and-part-time-employment-based-on-national-definitions/sweden/">Incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national in Sweden</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national definitions
Unit
Percentage of population in the same subgroup
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
53 places, 1,842 data points, 1966–2025
Last refreshed

This dataset contains incidences and gender composition of part-time employment with standardised (15-24, 25-54, 55-64, 65+, total) and detailed age groups. Data are further broken down by professional status - employees, total employment. Part-time employment is based on national definitions. The definition of part-time work varies considerably across OECD countries Essentially three main approaches can be distinguished: i) a classification based on the worker's perception of his/her employment situation; ii) a cut-off (generally 30 or 35 hours per week) based on usual working hours, with persons usually working fewer hours being considered part-timers; iii) a comparable cut-off based on actual hours worked during the reference week. A criterion based on actual hours will generally yield a part-time rate higher than one based on usual hours, particularly if there are temporary reductions in working time as a result of holidays, illness, short-timing, etc. On the other hand, it is not entirely clear whether a classification based on the worker's perception will necessarily yield estimates of part-time work that are higher or lower than one based on a fixed cut-off. In one country (France) which changed from 1981 to 1982 from a definition based on an actual hours cut-off (30 hours) to one based on the respondent's perception, the latter criterion appeared to produce slightly higher estimates. In order to facilitate analysis and comparisons over time, historical data for OECD members have been provided over as long a period as possible, often even before a country became a member of the Organisation. Information on the membership dates of all OECD countries can be found at OECD Ratification Dates. For detailed information on labour force surveys for all countries please see LFS_NOTES_SOURCES.