Incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national in Finland

Finland: Incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national was 80.81 Percentage of population in the same subgroup in 2025. ▼ Falling

Latest (2025)
80.81 Percentage of population in the same subgroup
Change on year
down 0.7%
World rank
20th
of 40 countries
All-time high
94 Percentage of population in the same subgroup
in 1977
All-time low
80.81 Percentage of population in the same subgroup
in 2025
Years of data
50
1976–2025

Incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national in Finland, 1976–2025

020406080100197620002025

Source: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Measured in Percentage of population in the same subgroup.

Analysis

Finland recorded 80.81 Percentage of population in the same subgroup for incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national in 2025. That is the lowest value across all 50 years on record.

The figure is down 0.7% on the previous year and down 4.3% over ten years.

Over the whole period, incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national in Finland peaked at 94 Percentage of population in the same subgroup in 1977 and was at its lowest, 80.81 Percentage of population in the same subgroup, in 2025.

That places Finland 20th out of 40 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 50 years of available data.

Incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national in Finland, year by year

Annual values for Incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national definitions in Finland, 1976 to 2025.
Year Percentage of population in the same subgroup Change
1976 93.41 Percentage of population in the same subgroup
1977 94 Percentage of population in the same subgroup +0.6%
1978 93.77 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.2%
1979 93.36 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.4%
1980 93.34 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.0%
1981 92.64 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.7%
1982 92.34 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.3%
1983 92.29 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.0%
1984 91.71 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.6%
1985 91.84 Percentage of population in the same subgroup +0.1%
1986 92.01 Percentage of population in the same subgroup +0.2%
1987 91.97 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.1%
1988 92.72 Percentage of population in the same subgroup +0.8%
1989 90.23 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -2.7%
1990 90.54 Percentage of population in the same subgroup +0.3%
1991 89.91 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.7%
1992 89.53 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.4%
1993 88.6 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -1.0%
1994 88.48 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.1%
1995 88.34 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.2%
1996 88.46 Percentage of population in the same subgroup +0.1%
1997 89.07 Percentage of population in the same subgroup +0.7%
1998 88.55 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.6%
1999 87.98 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.6%
2000 87.74 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.3%
2001 87.83 Percentage of population in the same subgroup +0.1%
2002 87.26 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.6%
2003 86.9 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.4%
2004 86.47 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.5%
2005 86.28 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.2%
2006 85.95 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.4%
2007 85.91 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.1%
2008 86.65 Percentage of population in the same subgroup +0.9%
2009 86.03 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.7%
2010 85.37 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.8%
2011 85.06 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.4%
2012 84.91 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.2%
2013 84.94 Percentage of population in the same subgroup +0.0%
2014 84.57 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.4%
2015 84.46 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.1%
2016 83.7 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.9%
2017 83.49 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.3%
2018 83.32 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.2%
2019 82.88 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.5%
2020 83.62 Percentage of population in the same subgroup +0.9%
2021 81.42 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -2.6%
2022 81.22 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.2%
2023 81.21 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.0%
2024 81.35 Percentage of population in the same subgroup +0.2%
2025 80.81 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.7%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1970s 93.63 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 93.36 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 94 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 4
1980s 92.11 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 90.23 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 93.34 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 10
1990s 88.95 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 87.98 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 90.54 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 10
2000s 86.7 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 85.91 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 87.83 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 10
2010s 84.27 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 82.88 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 85.37 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 10
2020s 81.6 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 80.81 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 83.62 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 6

Countries ranked near Finland

  1. 17 Canada 81.77 Percentage of population in the same subgroup compare
  2. 18 Ireland 81.69 Percentage of population in the same subgroup compare
  3. 19 Luxembourg 81.31 Percentage of population in the same subgroup compare
  4. 21 Costa Rica 80.53 Percentage of population in the same subgroup compare
  5. 22 Chile 80.03 Percentage of population in the same subgroup compare
  6. 23 New Zealand 79.67 Percentage of population in the same subgroup compare

See the full ranking of 53 places →

More work & labour data for Finland

All data for Finland →

Frequently asked questions

What is incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national in Finland?
Incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national in Finland was 80.81 Percentage of population in the same subgroup in 2025, according to Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
What is the highest incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national recorded in Finland?
The highest recorded value was 94 Percentage of population in the same subgroup in 1977.
What is the lowest incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national recorded in Finland?
The lowest recorded value was 80.81 Percentage of population in the same subgroup in 2025.
How does Finland rank for incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national?
Finland ranks 20th out of 40 countries with data for 2025.
Is incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national rising or falling in Finland?
Over the last ten years it is down 4.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Finland data come from?
The figures come from Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as part of Incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national definitions. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 50 observations, free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national in Finland. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/incidence-of-full-time-and-part-time-employment-based-on-national-definitions/finland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/incidence-of-full-time-and-part-time-employment-based-on-national-definitions/finland/">Incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national in Finland</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national definitions
Unit
Percentage of population in the same subgroup
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
53 places, 1,842 data points, 1966–2025
Last refreshed

This dataset contains incidences and gender composition of part-time employment with standardised (15-24, 25-54, 55-64, 65+, total) and detailed age groups. Data are further broken down by professional status - employees, total employment. Part-time employment is based on national definitions. The definition of part-time work varies considerably across OECD countries Essentially three main approaches can be distinguished: i) a classification based on the worker's perception of his/her employment situation; ii) a cut-off (generally 30 or 35 hours per week) based on usual working hours, with persons usually working fewer hours being considered part-timers; iii) a comparable cut-off based on actual hours worked during the reference week. A criterion based on actual hours will generally yield a part-time rate higher than one based on usual hours, particularly if there are temporary reductions in working time as a result of holidays, illness, short-timing, etc. On the other hand, it is not entirely clear whether a classification based on the worker's perception will necessarily yield estimates of part-time work that are higher or lower than one based on a fixed cut-off. In one country (France) which changed from 1981 to 1982 from a definition based on an actual hours cut-off (30 hours) to one based on the respondent's perception, the latter criterion appeared to produce slightly higher estimates. In order to facilitate analysis and comparisons over time, historical data for OECD members have been provided over as long a period as possible, often even before a country became a member of the Organisation. Information on the membership dates of all OECD countries can be found at OECD Ratification Dates. For detailed information on labour force surveys for all countries please see LFS_NOTES_SOURCES.