Incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national in Australia

Australia: Incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national was 68.88 Percentage of population in the same subgroup in 2025. ▼ Falling

Latest (2025)
68.88 Percentage of population in the same subgroup
Change on year
down 0.2%
World rank
37th
of 40 countries
All-time high
90.15 Percentage of population in the same subgroup
in 1966
All-time low
68.32 Percentage of population in the same subgroup
in 2018
Years of data
60
1966–2025

Incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national in Australia, 1966–2025

020406080100196619952025

Source: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Measured in Percentage of population in the same subgroup.

Analysis

The most recent figure for incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national in Australia is 68.88 Percentage of population in the same subgroup, measured in 2025.

The figure is down 0.2% on the previous year and down 0.3% over ten years.

Over the whole period, incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national in Australia peaked at 90.15 Percentage of population in the same subgroup in 1966 and was at its lowest, 68.32 Percentage of population in the same subgroup, in 2018.

That places Australia 37th out of 40 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the bottom quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 60 years of available data.

Incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national in Australia, year by year

Annual values for Incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national definitions in Australia, 1966 to 2025.
Year Percentage of population in the same subgroup Change
1966 90.15 Percentage of population in the same subgroup
1967 89.67 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.5%
1968 89.5 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.2%
1969 88.95 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.6%
1970 89.44 Percentage of population in the same subgroup +0.5%
1971 89.56 Percentage of population in the same subgroup +0.1%
1972 88.92 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.7%
1973 88.07 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -1.0%
1974 87.58 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.6%
1975 86.4 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -1.3%
1976 85.4 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -1.2%
1977 84.97 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.5%
1978 84.54 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.5%
1979 84.43 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.1%
1980 84.07 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.4%
1981 83.87 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.2%
1982 83.43 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.5%
1983 82.77 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.8%
1984 82.41 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.4%
1985 82.06 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.4%
1986 81.24 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -1.0%
1987 80.42 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -1.0%
1988 80.18 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.3%
1989 79.45 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.9%
1990 78.82 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.8%
1991 77.75 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -1.4%
1992 76.51 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -1.6%
1993 76.67 Percentage of population in the same subgroup +0.2%
1994 76.05 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.8%
1995 75.66 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.5%
1996 75.39 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.4%
1997 74.69 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.9%
1998 74.2 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.7%
1999 74.01 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.3%
2000 73.66 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.5%
2001 72.54 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -1.5%
2002 71.72 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -1.1%
2003 71.41 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.4%
2004 71.74 Percentage of population in the same subgroup +0.5%
2005 71.51 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.3%
2006 71.43 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.1%
2007 71.71 Percentage of population in the same subgroup +0.4%
2008 71.61 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.1%
2009 70.6 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -1.4%
2010 70.23 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.5%
2011 70.44 Percentage of population in the same subgroup +0.3%
2012 70.39 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.1%
2013 69.8 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.8%
2014 69.37 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.6%
2015 69.06 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.4%
2016 68.35 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -1.0%
2017 68.34 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.0%
2018 68.32 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.0%
2019 68.46 Percentage of population in the same subgroup +0.2%
2020 68.5 Percentage of population in the same subgroup +0.1%
2021 68.58 Percentage of population in the same subgroup +0.1%
2022 69.37 Percentage of population in the same subgroup +1.2%
2023 69.67 Percentage of population in the same subgroup +0.4%
2024 68.99 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -1.0%
2025 68.88 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.2%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1960s 89.57 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 88.95 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 90.15 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 4
1970s 86.93 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 84.43 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 89.56 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 10
1980s 81.99 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 79.45 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 84.07 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 10
1990s 75.98 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 74.01 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 78.82 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 10
2000s 71.79 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 70.6 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 73.66 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 10
2010s 69.28 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 68.32 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 70.44 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 10
2020s 69 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 68.5 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 69.67 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 6

Countries ranked near Australia

  1. 34 Belgium 73.72 Percentage of population in the same subgroup compare
  2. 35 Denmark 72.47 Percentage of population in the same subgroup compare
  3. 36 Austria 68.97 Percentage of population in the same subgroup compare
  4. 38 Germany 68.76 Percentage of population in the same subgroup compare
  5. 39 Indonesia 67.37 Percentage of population in the same subgroup compare
  6. 40 Switzerland 61.34 Percentage of population in the same subgroup compare

See the full ranking of 53 places →

More work & labour data for Australia

All data for Australia →

Frequently asked questions

What is incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national in Australia?
Incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national in Australia was 68.88 Percentage of population in the same subgroup in 2025, according to Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
What is the highest incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national recorded in Australia?
The highest recorded value was 90.15 Percentage of population in the same subgroup in 1966.
What is the lowest incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national recorded in Australia?
The lowest recorded value was 68.32 Percentage of population in the same subgroup in 2018.
How does Australia rank for incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national?
Australia ranks 37th out of 40 countries with data for 2025.
Is incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national rising or falling in Australia?
Over the last ten years it is down 0.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Australia data come from?
The figures come from Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as part of Incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national definitions. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 60 observations, free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national in Australia. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/incidence-of-full-time-and-part-time-employment-based-on-national-definitions/australia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/incidence-of-full-time-and-part-time-employment-based-on-national-definitions/australia/">Incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national in Australia</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national definitions
Unit
Percentage of population in the same subgroup
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
53 places, 1,842 data points, 1966–2025
Last refreshed

This dataset contains incidences and gender composition of part-time employment with standardised (15-24, 25-54, 55-64, 65+, total) and detailed age groups. Data are further broken down by professional status - employees, total employment. Part-time employment is based on national definitions. The definition of part-time work varies considerably across OECD countries Essentially three main approaches can be distinguished: i) a classification based on the worker's perception of his/her employment situation; ii) a cut-off (generally 30 or 35 hours per week) based on usual working hours, with persons usually working fewer hours being considered part-timers; iii) a comparable cut-off based on actual hours worked during the reference week. A criterion based on actual hours will generally yield a part-time rate higher than one based on usual hours, particularly if there are temporary reductions in working time as a result of holidays, illness, short-timing, etc. On the other hand, it is not entirely clear whether a classification based on the worker's perception will necessarily yield estimates of part-time work that are higher or lower than one based on a fixed cut-off. In one country (France) which changed from 1981 to 1982 from a definition based on an actual hours cut-off (30 hours) to one based on the respondent's perception, the latter criterion appeared to produce slightly higher estimates. In order to facilitate analysis and comparisons over time, historical data for OECD members have been provided over as long a period as possible, often even before a country became a member of the Organisation. Information on the membership dates of all OECD countries can be found at OECD Ratification Dates. For detailed information on labour force surveys for all countries please see LFS_NOTES_SOURCES.