Employment (ILO modelled estimates), per unit of GDP in Macau, China
Macau, China: Employment (ILO modelled estimates), per unit of GDP was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Employment (ILO modelled estimates), per unit of GDP in Macau, China, 1991–2025
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
The most recent figure for employment (ilo modelled estimates), per unit of gdp in Macau, China is 0 units per US$ of GDP, measured in 2025.
That represents a change of down 5.2% on the previous year and down 5.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, employment (ilo modelled estimates), per unit of gdp in Macau, China peaked at 0 units per US$ of GDP in 1991 and was at its lowest, 0 units per US$ of GDP, in 2014.
Macau, China ranks 170th of 185 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Employment (ILO modelled estimates), per unit of GDP in Macau, China, year by year
| Year | units per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1991 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1992 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -21.1% |
| 1993 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -8.5% |
| 1994 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -6.3% |
| 1995 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -7.4% |
| 1996 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +1.7% |
| 1997 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +3.9% |
| 1998 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +7.7% |
| 1999 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +5.1% |
| 2000 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -1.5% |
| 2001 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +1.5% |
| 2002 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -4.3% |
| 2003 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -9.9% |
| 2004 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -16.9% |
| 2005 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -6.3% |
| 2006 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -12.1% |
| 2007 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -12.3% |
| 2008 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -7.3% |
| 2009 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +0.4% |
| 2010 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -20.5% |
| 2011 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -20.0% |
| 2012 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -12.6% |
| 2013 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -14.6% |
| 2014 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -3.7% |
| 2015 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +23.0% |
| 2016 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +0.4% |
| 2017 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -9.4% |
| 2018 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -6.8% |
| 2019 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +1.2% |
| 2020 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +115.6% |
| 2021 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -15.6% |
| 2022 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +20.4% |
| 2023 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -43.3% |
| 2024 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -6.4% |
| 2025 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -5.2% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 9 |
| 2000s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 6 |
Countries ranked near Macau, China
- 167 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 168 Germany 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 169 Finland 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 171 Australia 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 172 Sweden 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 173 Austria 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
More work & labour data for Macau, China
- Labour force (ILO modelled estimates) 420.81 (2027)
- Persons outside the labour force (ILO modelled estimates) 208.94 (2027)
- Labour force participation rate (ILO modelled estimates) 66.82 (2027)
- Labour dependency ratio 0.769 (2027)
- Employment-to-population ratio (ILO modelled estimates) 64.99 (2027)
- Output per worker, GDP constant 2021 international $ at PPP 206,074 (2027)
- Labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), annual growth rate -0.2761 % change on previous year (2027)
- Persons outside the labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+) 2.38 % change on previous year (2027)
- Output per worker, GDP constant 2015 US $ 117,019 (2027)
- Ratio of female to male labor force participation rate (%) 85.7% (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is employment (ilo modelled estimates), per unit of gdp in Macau, China?
- Employment (ilo modelled estimates), per unit of gdp in Macau, China was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2025, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest employment (ilo modelled estimates), per unit of gdp recorded in Macau, China?
- The highest recorded value was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 1991.
- What is the lowest employment (ilo modelled estimates), per unit of gdp recorded in Macau, China?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2014.
- How does Macau, China rank for employment (ilo modelled estimates), per unit of gdp?
- Macau, China ranks 170th out of 185 countries with data for 2025.
- Is employment (ilo modelled estimates), per unit of gdp rising or falling in Macau, China?
- Over the last ten years it is down 5.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Macau, China data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Employment (ILO modelled estimates), per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 35 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Employment (ILO modelled estimates) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Employment (ILO modelled estimates) ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Employment International Labour Organization
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Employment (ILO modelled estimates) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.