Employment (ILO modelled estimates), per unit of GDP in Congo
Congo: Employment (ILO modelled estimates), per unit of GDP was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Employment (ILO modelled estimates), per unit of GDP in Congo, 1991–2025
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
Congo recorded 0 units per US$ of GDP for employment (ilo modelled estimates), per unit of gdp in 2025.
The figure is down 0.5% on the previous year and up 0.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, employment (ilo modelled estimates), per unit of gdp in Congo peaked at 0 units per US$ of GDP in 1998 and was at its lowest, 0 units per US$ of GDP, in 2013.
That places Congo 48th out of 185 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Employment (ILO modelled estimates), per unit of GDP in Congo, year by year
| Year | units per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1991 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1992 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -4.2% |
| 1993 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +12.8% |
| 1994 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +56.1% |
| 1995 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -13.8% |
| 1996 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -14.0% |
| 1997 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +11.8% |
| 1998 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +21.7% |
| 1999 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -15.0% |
| 2000 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -23.3% |
| 2001 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +20.7% |
| 2002 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -5.3% |
| 2003 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -11.0% |
| 2004 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -21.9% |
| 2005 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -27.0% |
| 2006 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -13.9% |
| 2007 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -4.8% |
| 2008 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -22.1% |
| 2009 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +25.1% |
| 2010 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -22.3% |
| 2011 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -13.6% |
| 2012 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -9.4% |
| 2013 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -0.0% |
| 2014 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +2.4% |
| 2015 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +46.5% |
| 2016 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +15.9% |
| 2017 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -5.9% |
| 2018 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -18.0% |
| 2019 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +8.9% |
| 2020 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +16.7% |
| 2021 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -19.4% |
| 2022 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +2.4% |
| 2023 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +6.6% |
| 2024 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +0.5% |
| 2025 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -0.5% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 9 |
| 2000s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 6 |
Countries ranked near Congo
- 45 Nicaragua 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 46 Haiti 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 47 Tajikistan 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 49 Côte d'Ivoire 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 50 Kyrgyzstan 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 51 Zimbabwe 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
More work & labour data for Congo
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual 0.6949 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth 0.6877 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth 0.7017 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate 0.2906 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 2.46 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 9,208 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 2,302 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 10,131 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 9,894 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 20,026 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is employment (ilo modelled estimates), per unit of gdp in Congo?
- Employment (ilo modelled estimates), per unit of gdp in Congo was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2025, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest employment (ilo modelled estimates), per unit of gdp recorded in Congo?
- The highest recorded value was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 1998.
- What is the lowest employment (ilo modelled estimates), per unit of gdp recorded in Congo?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2013.
- How does Congo rank for employment (ilo modelled estimates), per unit of gdp?
- Congo ranks 48th out of 185 countries with data for 2025.
- Is employment (ilo modelled estimates), per unit of gdp rising or falling in Congo?
- Over the last ten years it is up 0.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Congo data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Employment (ILO modelled estimates), per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 35 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Employment (ILO modelled estimates) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Employment (ILO modelled estimates) ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Employment International Labour Organization
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Employment (ILO modelled estimates) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.