Coverage of social safety net programs in poorest quintile in Russian Federation
Russian Federation: Coverage of social safety net programs in poorest quintile was 77.6% in 2017. ▲ Rising
Coverage of social safety net programs in poorest quintile in Russian Federation, 2007–2017
Source: ASPIRE: The Atlas of Social Protection - Indicators of Resilience and Equity, World Bank (WB). Measured in % of population.
Analysis
Russian Federation recorded 77.6% for coverage of social safety net programs in poorest quintile in 2017.
The figure is down 1.7% on the previous year and up 65.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, coverage of social safety net programs in poorest quintile in Russian Federation peaked at 78.9% in 2016 and was at its lowest, 46.8%, in 2007.
Russian Federation ranks 13th of 39 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
Coverage of social safety net programs in poorest quintile in Russian Federation, year by year
| Year | % of population | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 46.8% | — |
| 2014 | 76.3% | +63.0% |
| 2015 | 74.9% | -1.8% |
| 2016 | 78.9% | +5.3% |
| 2017 | 77.6% | -1.7% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 46.8% | 46.8% | 46.8% | 1 |
| 2010s | 76.9% | 74.9% | 78.9% | 4 |
Countries ranked near Russian Federation
More work & labour data for Russian Federation
- Persons outside the labour force (ILO modelled estimates) 48,131 (2027)
- Labour force participation rate (ILO modelled estimates) 59.78 (2027)
- Labour force (ILO modelled estimates) 71,526 (2027)
- Unemployment rate (ILO modelled estimates) 1.83 (2027)
- Labour dependency ratio 1.04 (2027)
- Output per worker, GDP constant 2021 international $ at PPP 89,043 (2027)
- Output per worker, GDP constant 2015 US $ 23,578 (2027)
- Employment-to-population ratio (ILO modelled estimates) 58.68 (2027)
- Persons outside the labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+) 1.81 % change on previous year (2027)
- Labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), annual growth rate -0.8326 % change on previous year (2027)
Frequently asked questions
- What is coverage of social safety net programs in poorest quintile in Russian Federation?
- Coverage of social safety net programs in poorest quintile in Russian Federation was 77.6% in 2017, according to ASPIRE: The Atlas of Social Protection - Indicators of Resilience and Equity, World Bank (WB).
- What is the highest coverage of social safety net programs in poorest quintile recorded in Russian Federation?
- The highest recorded value was 78.9% in 2016.
- What is the lowest coverage of social safety net programs in poorest quintile recorded in Russian Federation?
- The lowest recorded value was 46.8% in 2007.
- How does Russian Federation rank for coverage of social safety net programs in poorest quintile?
- Russian Federation ranks 13th out of 39 countries with data for 2017.
- Is coverage of social safety net programs in poorest quintile rising or falling in Russian Federation?
- Over the last ten years it is up 65.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Russian Federation data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE: The Atlas of Social Protection - Indicators of Resilience and Equity, World Bank (WB), published as part of Coverage of social safety net programs in poorest quintile (% of population). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Coverage of social safety net programs shows the percentage of population participating in cash transfers and last resort programs, noncontributory social pensions, other cash transfers programs (child, family and orphan allowances, birth and death grants, disability benefits, and other allowances), conditional cash transfers, in-kind food transfers (food stamps and vouchers, food rations, supplementary feeding, and emergency food distribution), school feeding, other social assistance programs (housing allowances, scholarships, fee waivers, health subsidies, and other social assistance) and public works programs (cash for work and food for work). Estimates include both direct and indirect beneficiaries.