Coverage of social safety net programs in poorest quintile in Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan: Coverage of social safety net programs in poorest quintile was 41.1% in 2021. ▼ Falling
Coverage of social safety net programs in poorest quintile in Kazakhstan, 2007–2021
Source: ASPIRE: The Atlas of Social Protection - Indicators of Resilience and Equity, World Bank (WB). Measured in % of population.
Analysis
In 2021, coverage of social safety net programs in poorest quintile in Kazakhstan stood at 41.1%.
The figure is down 8.0% on the previous year and down 8.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, coverage of social safety net programs in poorest quintile in Kazakhstan peaked at 74.3% in 2014 and was at its lowest, 32.3%, in 2018.
Kazakhstan ranks 30th of 39 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
Coverage of social safety net programs in poorest quintile in Kazakhstan, year by year
| Year | % of population | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 42.2% | — |
| 2010 | 45.0% | +6.7% |
| 2014 | 74.3% | +65.2% |
| 2015 | 44.6% | -40.0% |
| 2017 | 36.2% | -18.8% |
| 2018 | 32.3% | -10.8% |
| 2019 | 36.7% | +13.8% |
| 2020 | 44.7% | +21.6% |
| 2021 | 41.1% | -8.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 42.2% | 42.2% | 42.2% | 1 |
| 2010s | 44.9% | 32.3% | 74.3% | 6 |
| 2020s | 42.9% | 41.1% | 44.7% | 2 |
Countries ranked near Kazakhstan
More work & labour data for Kazakhstan
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual 0.2152 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth 0.2212 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth 0.2086 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.02 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 1.25 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 15,866 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 7,093 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 16,815 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 16,857 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 33,672 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is coverage of social safety net programs in poorest quintile in Kazakhstan?
- Coverage of social safety net programs in poorest quintile in Kazakhstan was 41.1% in 2021, according to ASPIRE: The Atlas of Social Protection - Indicators of Resilience and Equity, World Bank (WB).
- What is the highest coverage of social safety net programs in poorest quintile recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The highest recorded value was 74.3% in 2014.
- What is the lowest coverage of social safety net programs in poorest quintile recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The lowest recorded value was 32.3% in 2018.
- How does Kazakhstan rank for coverage of social safety net programs in poorest quintile?
- Kazakhstan ranks 30th out of 39 countries with data for 2021.
- Is coverage of social safety net programs in poorest quintile rising or falling in Kazakhstan?
- Over the last ten years it is down 8.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Kazakhstan data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE: The Atlas of Social Protection - Indicators of Resilience and Equity, World Bank (WB), published as part of Coverage of social safety net programs in poorest quintile (% of population). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Coverage of social safety net programs shows the percentage of population participating in cash transfers and last resort programs, noncontributory social pensions, other cash transfers programs (child, family and orphan allowances, birth and death grants, disability benefits, and other allowances), conditional cash transfers, in-kind food transfers (food stamps and vouchers, food rations, supplementary feeding, and emergency food distribution), school feeding, other social assistance programs (housing allowances, scholarships, fee waivers, health subsidies, and other social assistance) and public works programs (cash for work and food for work). Estimates include both direct and indirect beneficiaries.