Coverage in extreme poor (<$2.15 a day) (%) - Domestic Private in Poland

Poland: Coverage in extreme poor (<$2.15 a day) (%) - Domestic Private was 0.0% in 2017. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2017)
0.0%
World rank
26th
of 30 countries
All-time high
71.0%
in 2009
All-time low
0.0%
in 2010
Years of data
10
2005–2017

Coverage in extreme poor (<$2.15 a day) (%) - Domestic Private in Poland, 2005–2017

0204060802005201120172005: 30.52006: 47.32007: 12.52008: 40.12009: 712010: 02011: 68.52012: 4.62016: 02017: 0

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

In 2017, coverage in extreme poor (<$2.15 a day) (%) - domestic private in Poland stood at 0.0%. That is the lowest value across all 10 years on record.

That represents a change of down 100.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, coverage in extreme poor (<$2.15 a day) (%) - domestic private in Poland peaked at 71.0% in 2009 and was at its lowest, 0.0%, in 2010.

That places Poland 26th out of 30 countries with data for 2017, putting it in the bottom quarter.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Coverage in extreme poor (<$2.15 a day) (%) - Domestic Private in Poland, year by year

Annual values for Coverage in extreme poor (<$2.15 a day) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers in Poland, 2005 to 2017.
Year Value Change
2005 30.5%
2006 47.3% +55.0%
2007 12.5% -73.6%
2008 40.1% +221.4%
2009 71.0% +77.1%
2010 0.0% -100.0%
2011 68.5%
2012 4.6% -93.3%
2016 0.0% -100.0%
2017 0.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 40.3% 12.5% 71.0% 5
2010s 14.6% 0.0% 68.5% 5

Countries ranked near Poland

  1. 23 El Salvador 7.4% compare
  2. 24 Sri Lanka 4.9% compare
  3. 25 Kazakhstan 4.8% compare
  4. 26 Belarus 0.0% compare
  5. 26 Moldova 0.0%
  6. 26 Mongolia 0.0% compare
  7. 26 Vietnam 0.0% compare

See the full ranking of 30 places →

More work & labour data for Poland

All data for Poland →

Frequently asked questions

What is coverage in extreme poor (<$2.15 a day) (%) - domestic private in Poland?
Coverage in extreme poor (<$2.15 a day) (%) - domestic private in Poland was 0.0% in 2017, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest coverage in extreme poor (<$2.15 a day) (%) - domestic private recorded in Poland?
The highest recorded value was 71.0% in 2009.
What is the lowest coverage in extreme poor (<$2.15 a day) (%) - domestic private recorded in Poland?
The lowest recorded value was 0.0% in 2010.
How does Poland rank for coverage in extreme poor (<$2.15 a day) (%) - domestic private?
Poland ranks 26th out of 30 countries with data for 2017.
Is coverage in extreme poor (<$2.15 a day) (%) - domestic private rising or falling in Poland?
Over the last ten years it is down 100.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Poland data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Coverage in extreme poor (<$2.15 a day) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 10 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Coverage in extreme poor (<$2.15 a day) (%) - Domestic Private in Poland. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/coverage-in-extreme-poor-2-15-a-day-percent-domestic-private-transfers/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/coverage-in-extreme-poor-2-15-a-day-percent-domestic-private-transfers/poland/">Coverage in extreme poor (<$2.15 a day) (%) - Domestic Private in Poland</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Coverage in extreme poor (<$2.15 a day) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
30 places, 305 data points, 2003–2023
Last refreshed

Percentage of population participating in Domestic Private Transfers programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)